Mrs. Miniver
1942 · 134 min · Director: William Wyler
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Middle-class housewife Kay Miniver deals with petty problems. She and her husband Clem watch her Oxford-educated son Vin court Carol Beldon, the charming granddaughter of the local nobility as represented by Lady Beldon. Then the war comes and Vin joins the RAF.
Emotional fingerprint
Mrs. Miniver (1942) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 30%, Sadness 25%, Hope 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Sadness, Hope. Genres: Drama, Romance, War. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Sadness and Hope. Its IMDb rating of 7.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Sadness
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Sadness | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 37 % | 5 % | 0 % | 13 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Humor | 40 % | 6 % | 0 % | 26 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Love | 43 % | 13 % | 1 % | 30 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 43 % | 21 % | 5 % | 24 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Love | 48 % | 33 % | 15 % | 24 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Tension | 53 % | 44 % | 25 % | 20 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Tension | 48 % | 43 % | 20 % | 15 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Humor | 46 % | 38 % | 13 % | 25 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Love | 57 % | 45 % | 14 % | 34 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Tension | 70 % | 63 % | 14 % | 21 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 75 % | 71 % | 18 % | 10 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Tension | 75 % | 53 % | 20 % | 23 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Relief | 70 % | 26 % | 14 % | 41 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Relief | 63 % | 32 % | 13 % | 40 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Tension | 66 % | 48 % | 20 % | 41 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Love | 69 % | 35 % | 21 % | 46 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 111′ | Relief | 68 % | 38 % | 14 % | 31 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 117′ | Tension | 79 % | 65 % | 31 % | 25 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 124′ | Sadness | 88 % | 64 % | 66 % | 29 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 131′ | Sadness | 87 % | 43 % | 78 % | 25 % |
Oedipus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Judy Miniver
Ada
Simpson
Details
- Directed by
- William Wyler
- Written by
- Claudine West, George Froeschel, James Hilton, Arthur Wimperis, Jan Struther
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1942
- Runtime
- 134 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Empathy
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
