The Big Bounce
2004 · 88 min · Director: George Armitage
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A small-time con artist and a Hawaiian real estate developer's mischievous, enterprising mistress team up for a potential $200,000 score.
Emotional fingerprint
The Big Bounce (2004) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Excitement 25%, Curiosity 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Excitement25%
- Curiosity20%
- Surprise15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Curiosity. Genres: Comedy, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Curiosity. Its IMDb rating of 4.9/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 55/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Tension
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Tension | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Tension | 38 % | 27 % | 33 % | 20 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 39 % | 28 % | 32 % | 26 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 29 % | 33 % | 36 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 40 % | 32 % | 26 % | 35 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 39 % | 36 % | 19 % | 29 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 43 % | 38 % | 25 % | 30 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 43 % | 35 % | 33 % | 34 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 35 % | 29 % | 35 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Humor | 43 % | 40 % | 29 % | 32 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Humor | 45 % | 43 % | 35 % | 30 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Humor | 45 % | 44 % | 35 % | 31 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Humor | 46 % | 43 % | 36 % | 31 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Tension | 48 % | 39 % | 43 % | 34 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 40 % | 45 % | 39 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Humor | 54 % | 43 % | 49 % | 39 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 60 % | 45 % | 55 % | 39 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Humor | 59 % | 46 % | 48 % | 36 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Relief | 52 % | 42 % | 30 % | 30 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Barry Salu
Number 9 (Virginia)
Hawaiian Priest
Worker #1 (Jimmy Opono)
Worker #2 (Con Nuuiwa)
Worker #3
Worker #4
Wendy the Party Planner
Waitress Celia / PBN Girl
Details
- Directed by
- George Armitage
- Written by
- Elmore Leonard, Sebastian Gutierrez
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2004
- Runtime
- 88 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
