Gigi & Nate
2022 · 114 min · Director: Nick Hamm
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A young man with a bright future suffers a near-fatal accident and recreates his new life with the help of an unlikely animal friend.
Emotional fingerprint
Gigi & Nate (2022) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 35%, Sadness 25%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Empathy35%
- Sadness25%
- Love20%
- Inspiration10%
- Relief10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Sadness, Love. Genres: Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Sadness and Love. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Empathy
- Tension
- Hope
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Empathy | Tension | Hope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Empathy | 47 % | 30 % | 28 % | 25 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Joy | 56 % | 28 % | 35 % | 16 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Tension | 74 % | 46 % | 63 % | 10 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Tension | 86 % | 71 % | 80 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Sadness | 83 % | 76 % | 64 % | 35 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Hope | 69 % | 63 % | 36 % | 49 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Empathy | 52 % | 46 % | 28 % | 40 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Empathy | 51 % | 46 % | 40 % | 24 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Sadness | 63 % | 56 % | 49 % | 26 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Hope | 69 % | 55 % | 33 % | 50 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Hope | 65 % | 45 % | 23 % | 56 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Joy | 56 % | 34 % | 34 % | 38 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Joy | 55 % | 36 % | 44 % | 26 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Empathy | 69 % | 51 % | 59 % | 21 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 77 % | 57 % | 73 % | 24 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Tension | 77 % | 65 % | 70 % | 40 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Empathy | 81 % | 78 % | 56 % | 44 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Sadness | 86 % | 79 % | 34 % | 45 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Hope | 88 % | 72 % | 15 % | 63 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 111′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Icarus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Gigi & Nate. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Annabelle Gibson
Travis Holter
Carolyn Alibon
Dr. Steinberg
Dr. Paditar
Senator Parsons
News Reporter
Dr. Clark
Police Officer
Town Kid
Details
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
