Killing Gunther
2017 · 92 min · Director: Taran Killam, Taran Killam
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A group of eccentric assassins are fed up with Gunther, the world's greatest hitman, and decide to kill him – but their plan turns into a series of bungled encounters as Gunther seems to always be one step ahead.
Emotional fingerprint
Killing Gunther (2017) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 40%, Excitement 25%, Surprise 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor40%
- Excitement25%
- Surprise15%
- Smile10%
- Tension10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Surprise. Genres: Comedy, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 4.8/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Surprise
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Surprise
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Surprise | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 58 % | 55 % | 27 % | 28 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 61 % | 59 % | 26 % | 23 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 63 % | 59 % | 32 % | 29 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 63 % | 57 % | 32 % | 35 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Humor | 61 % | 58 % | 23 % | 26 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 60 % | 57 % | 21 % | 28 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Humor | 64 % | 51 % | 31 % | 46 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Tension | 71 % | 41 % | 44 % | 64 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Tension | 74 % | 45 % | 45 % | 59 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Humor | 70 % | 53 % | 40 % | 43 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Surprise | 64 % | 44 % | 38 % | 38 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Sadness | 59 % | 31 % | 28 % | 30 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Sadness | 61 % | 30 % | 28 % | 25 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Sadness | 68 % | 39 % | 43 % | 39 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Tension | 69 % | 50 % | 48 % | 53 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Humor | 70 % | 50 % | 44 % | 57 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Tension | 71 % | 40 % | 44 % | 59 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Surprise | 66 % | 43 % | 44 % | 45 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Humor | 60 % | 51 % | 38 % | 28 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Humor | 55 % | 50 % | 28 % | 22 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Gabe Beales
Ashley Hill
Schneider Feizmark
Jewel
Details
- Directed by
- Taran Killam, Taran Killam
- Written by
- Taran Killam, Taran Killam
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2017
- Runtime
- 92 min
- Country
- Canada, United States of America, United Kingdom
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
