The Cincinnati Kid
1965 · 102 min · Director: Norman Jewison
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
An up-and-coming poker player tries to prove himself in a high-stakes match against a long-time master of the game.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
The Cincinnati Kid (1965) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 35%, Curiosity 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension35%
- Curiosity25%
- Anxiety20%
- Envy10%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Curiosity, Anxiety. Genres: Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Curiosity and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 7.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Anticipation
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Anticipation
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Anticipation | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 42 % | 35 % | 25 % | 25 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Tension | 49 % | 43 % | 31 % | 32 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Anticipation | 48 % | 35 % | 35 % | 36 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 40 % | 23 % | 29 % | 31 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Anticipation | 41 % | 25 % | 29 % | 28 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Sadness | 45 % | 30 % | 34 % | 28 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Anticipation | 49 % | 38 % | 36 % | 31 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Tension | 58 % | 53 % | 34 % | 38 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Tension | 54 % | 44 % | 24 % | 34 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 23 % | 19 % | 28 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 28 % | 31 % | 30 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Anticipation | 49 % | 43 % | 46 % | 32 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Tension | 53 % | 50 % | 48 % | 33 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Anticipation | 49 % | 49 % | 41 % | 31 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Tension | 46 % | 46 % | 38 % | 32 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Tension | 55 % | 55 % | 43 % | 39 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Tension | 65 % | 65 % | 48 % | 41 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Tension | 69 % | 69 % | 51 % | 39 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Tension | 75 % | 74 % | 59 % | 38 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Tension | 82 % | 78 % | 62 % | 37 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Felix
Cajun
Mrs. Rudd
Mrs. Slade
Referee (uncredited)
Details
- Directed by
- Norman Jewison
- Written by
- Terry Southern, Ring Lardner, Jr., Richard Jessup, Ring Lardner Jr.
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1965
- Runtime
- 102 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Genres
- Drama
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





