Guys and Dolls
1955 · 149 min · Director: Joseph L. Mankiewicz
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In New York, a gambler is challenged to take a cold female missionary to Havana, but they fall for each other, and the bet has a hidden motive to finance a crap game.
Emotional fingerprint
Guys and Dolls (1955) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Love 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Love25%
- Excitement20%
- Smile15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Romance, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 7.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Love
- Joy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Love | Joy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 4′ | Love | 38 % | 32 % | 23 % | 17 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 38 % | 35 % | 14 % | 14 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Humor | 39 % | 39 % | 13 % | 13 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Humor | 39 % | 39 % | 14 % | 10 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 41 % | 34 % | 24 % | 11 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Love | 48 % | 33 % | 36 % | 20 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Humor | 49 % | 41 % | 29 % | 23 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Humor | 46 % | 45 % | 20 % | 16 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Humor | 43 % | 40 % | 20 % | 14 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Humor | 40 % | 38 % | 23 % | 19 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Humor | 41 % | 30 % | 31 % | 23 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Love | 49 % | 21 % | 45 % | 29 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Love | 59 % | 20 % | 54 % | 35 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Love | 56 % | 20 % | 45 % | 25 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 108′ | Humor | 48 % | 26 % | 26 % | 11 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 115′ | Tension | 49 % | 35 % | 14 % | 8 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 123′ | Tension | 53 % | 38 % | 15 % | 10 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 130′ | Love | 50 % | 39 % | 20 % | 16 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 138′ | Humor | 49 % | 41 % | 21 % | 29 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 145′ | Joy | 52 % | 42 % | 28 % | 42 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Nicely-Nicely Johnson
Rusty Charlie
General Cartwright
Agatha
Angie the Ox
Mission Member
Cuban Singer
Dancer (uncredited)
Details
- Directed by
- Joseph L. Mankiewicz
- Written by
- Joseph L. Mankiewicz, Damon Runyon
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1955
- Runtime
- 149 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
