A Passage to India
1984 · 163 min · Director: David Lean
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Cultural mistrust and false accusations doom a friendship in British colonial India between an Indian doctor, an Englishwoman engaged to marry a city magistrate, and an English educator.
Emotional fingerprint
A Passage to India (1984) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 30%, Empathy 25%, Anticipation 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Awe30%
- Empathy25%
- Anticipation20%
- Sadness15%
- Nostalgia10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Empathy, Anticipation. Genres: Drama, History, Adventure. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Empathy and Anticipation. Its IMDb rating of 7.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Empathy
- Relief
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Empathy | Relief |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 4′ | Curiosity | 32 % | 16 % | 12 % | 2 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Tension | 35 % | 23 % | 19 % | 3 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 24 % | 29 % | 4 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Empathy | 39 % | 19 % | 33 % | 5 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 15 % | 31 % | 6 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Curiosity | 35 % | 18 % | 29 % | 7 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Empathy | 37 % | 20 % | 34 % | 6 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Empathy | 42 % | 21 % | 36 % | 7 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 30 % | 30 % | 8 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Tension | 50 % | 44 % | 25 % | 6 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Tension | 60 % | 56 % | 34 % | 1 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Tension | 66 % | 63 % | 49 % | 1 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Tension | 68 % | 64 % | 53 % | 3 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 110′ | Tension | 68 % | 65 % | 48 % | 2 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 118′ | Tension | 70 % | 68 % | 46 % | 1 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 126′ | Tension | 77 % | 72 % | 49 % | 22 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 134′ | Relief | 77 % | 68 % | 55 % | 47 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 143′ | Empathy | 68 % | 57 % | 56 % | 35 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 151′ | Empathy | 61 % | 41 % | 56 % | 24 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 159′ | Relief | 62 % | 25 % | 57 % | 35 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Hamidullah
Stella
Das
Hassan
Guide
Haq
Details
- Directed by
- David Lean
- Written by
- E.M. Forster, David Lean
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1984
- Runtime
- 163 min
- Country
- United Kingdom, United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
