What's Up, Doc?
1972 · 94 min · Director: Peter Bogdanovich
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
The accidental mix-up of four identical plaid overnight bags leads to a series of increasingly wild and wacky situations.
Emotional fingerprint
What's Up, Doc? (1972) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 42%, Smile 25%, Surprise 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor42%
- Smile25%
- Surprise18%
- Excitement10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Smile, Surprise. Genres: Comedy, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Smile and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 7.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 76/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Excitement
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Excitement
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Excitement | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 29 % | 25 % | 4 % | 11 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 39 % | 38 % | 6 % | 10 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 48 % | 47 % | 9 % | 13 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 49 % | 48 % | 10 % | 17 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Humor | 51 % | 50 % | 11 % | 18 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Humor | 57 % | 56 % | 16 % | 22 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Humor | 59 % | 57 % | 18 % | 25 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Humor | 56 % | 54 % | 18 % | 27 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Humor | 58 % | 54 % | 23 % | 36 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Humor | 60 % | 55 % | 28 % | 41 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Humor | 55 % | 50 % | 24 % | 32 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Humor | 49 % | 44 % | 15 % | 23 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Humor | 53 % | 49 % | 21 % | 28 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Humor | 64 % | 57 % | 42 % | 41 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Excitement | 71 % | 57 % | 62 % | 54 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Excitement | 72 % | 54 % | 58 % | 55 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Humor | 68 % | 60 % | 34 % | 38 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Humor | 64 % | 63 % | 18 % | 23 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Humor | 58 % | 55 % | 14 % | 14 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Humor | 54 % | 49 % | 13 % | 10 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Delivery Boy
Room Service Waiter
Jewel Thief
Details
- Directed by
- Peter Bogdanovich
- Written by
- Peter Bogdanovich, David Newman, Robert Benton, Buck Henry
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1972
- Runtime
- 94 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
