The Sacred Land
2000 · 20 min
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
The history of the exploitation of the Earth dates back to its original inhabitants by the farmers and landowners of Chiapas, the millennia-old organization of these peoples against oppression, and their struggle to recover their rights and the land that was violently taken from them.
Emotional fingerprint
The Sacred Land (2000) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anger 30%, Inspiration 25%, Empathy 25%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Anger30%
- Inspiration25%
- Empathy25%
- Hope20%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anger, Inspiration, Empathy. Genres: Documentary. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anger, Inspiration and Empathy. Use the emotional profile to decide whether it suits your next watch. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2000
- Runtime
- 20 min
- Genres
- Documentary
- Feels mostly
- Anger
- Data updated
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
