Leviticus
2026 · 88 min · Director: Adrian Chiarella
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Two teenage boys must escape a violent entity that takes the form of the person they desire most: each other.
Emotional fingerprint
Leviticus (2026) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 32%, Tension 25%, Love 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Tension, Love. Genres: Romance, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Tension and Love. Its IMDb rating of 6.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 66/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Fear
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Fear | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 35 % | 30 % | 15 % | 12 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 30 % | 16 % | 20 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 21 % | 10 % | 29 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Sadness | 43 % | 20 % | 8 % | 35 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 40 % | 25 % | 39 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Tension | 66 % | 60 % | 44 % | 43 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Tension | 73 % | 68 % | 51 % | 48 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Tension | 79 % | 73 % | 61 % | 55 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Empathy | 76 % | 69 % | 59 % | 60 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Tension | 71 % | 65 % | 54 % | 55 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Tension | 74 % | 63 % | 54 % | 53 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Empathy | 74 % | 55 % | 45 % | 60 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Sadness | 78 % | 64 % | 51 % | 64 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Tension | 83 % | 75 % | 64 % | 64 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Empathy | 81 % | 74 % | 64 % | 66 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 84 % | 79 % | 70 % | 68 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 88 % | 84 % | 77 % | 69 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Tension | 79 % | 71 % | 64 % | 64 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Empathy | 65 % | 55 % | 43 % | 53 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Naim Reid
Ryan Whelan
Marnie
Hunter
Izzie
Cathy Whelan
Macca
Jacky
Girl Reading Poem
Bill
Macca's Mate
Macca's Mate
Macca's Mate
Macca's Mate
Service Station Manager
Details
- Directed by
- Adrian Chiarella
- Written by
- Adrian Chiarella
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2026
- Runtime
- 88 min
- Country
- AU, US
- Language
- en
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Fear
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
