feeldb

Thirteen at Dinner

1985 · 95 min · Director: Lou Antonio ★ IMDb 6.2 · 3,137 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Hercule Poirot appears on a TV talk show with actor Bryan Martin who is making an action/detective movie with Jane Wilkinson. He also meets impressionist Carlotta Adams. They all go to a party and Jane asks him and Captain Hastings to go and meet her husband, Lord Edgware in regards to a divorce. They do so, to discover that the Lord had already granted her a divorce. Jane is delighted but drops hints that she could have killed the Lord if he didn't grant her the divorce. The next day Lord Edgware is found dead and all the staff at the Lord's house swear that Jane was the one who did it but witnesses at another Lord's party swear that Jane was with them. Carlotta then dies and Poirot must investigate as Inspector Japp is determined to put Jane away...

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Thirteen at Dinner

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Thirteen at Dinner (1985) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anticipation 35%, Confusion 25%, Satisfaction 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Anticipation, Confusion, Satisfaction. Genres: Thriller, Mystery, Crime. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Anticipation, Confusion and Satisfaction. Its IMDb rating of 6.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 66/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Curiosity
  • Tension
  • Surprise

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Curiosity
Tension
Surprise
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityCuriosityTensionSurprise
2.5 %≈ 2′Humor33 %22 %7 %10 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Humor38 %28 %8 %13 %
12.5 %≈ 12′Curiosity41 %38 %14 %15 %
17.5 %≈ 17′Curiosity48 %48 %25 %28 %
22.5 %≈ 21′Curiosity54 %54 %35 %34 %
27.5 %≈ 26′Curiosity56 %56 %41 %31 %
32.5 %≈ 31′Curiosity59 %60 %46 %32 %
37.5 %≈ 36′Curiosity57 %61 %41 %25 %
42.5 %≈ 40′Curiosity51 %55 %30 %16 %
47.5 %≈ 45′Curiosity46 %49 %24 %14 %
52.5 %≈ 50′Curiosity50 %54 %29 %19 %
57.5 %≈ 55′Curiosity57 %61 %39 %29 %
62.5 %≈ 59′Curiosity57 %61 %40 %29 %
67.5 %≈ 64′Curiosity55 %60 %39 %23 %
72.5 %≈ 69′Curiosity59 %60 %46 %25 %
77.5 %≈ 74′Curiosity63 %61 %53 %33 %
82.5 %≈ 78′Curiosity64 %66 %53 %34 %
87.5 %≈ 83′Curiosity68 %70 %54 %39 %
92.5 %≈ 88′Curiosity64 %54 %46 %40 %
97.5 %≈ 93′Humor53 %28 %32 %28 %
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Thirteen at Dinner. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Thirteen at Dinner — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

David Suchet

Insp. Japp

JC
Jonathan Cecil

Capt. Arthur Hastings

Bill Nighy

Ronald Marsh

DK
Diane Keen

Jenny Driver

JS
John Stride

Film Director

BT
Benedict Taylor

Donald Ross

LH
Lee Horsley

Bryan Martin

AC
Allan Cuthbertson

Sir Montague Corner

GB
Glyn Baker

Butler

JB
John Barron

Lord Edgware

PC
Peter Clapham

Mr. Wildburn

LD
Lesley Dunlop

Alice Bennett

AE
Avril Elgar

Miss Carroll

RK
Russell Keith Grant

Moxon

RM
Roger Milner

Duke of Merton's Footman

DN
David Neville

Young Man

AP
Amanda Pays

Geraldine Marsh

PS
Pamela Salem

Mrs. Wildburn

Details

Directed by
Lou Antonio
Written by
Agatha Christie, Rod Browning
Type
Movies
Released
1985
Runtime
95 min
Country
United States, United Kingdom
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.2 · 3,137 ratings
Feels mostly
Anticipation
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.