The Manhattan Project
1986 · 118 min · Director: Marshall Brickman
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Paul Stephens, a high school student in Ithaca, New York, is generally unmotivated academically despite being a science geek, his interest, as per his age, mostly in those science items that have a wow factor. It is his interest in science that connects him to Dr. John Mathewson, a scientist recently having relocated to Ithaca and who is interested romantically in Paul's soon to be divorced mother, Elizabeth Stephens. It is in that want to impress Elizabeth through Paul that John invites Paul to Medatomics, a medical research facility, so that he can demonstrate some of those "wow" type experiments on which he and his colleagues are working. While impressed enough, Paul is nonetheless more interested in something else in the facility that John only makes passing reference to when asked, that "green goo" which in combination with other things Paul discovers around the facility making him believe that the facility really a secret government nuclear one, the green goo radioactive material for atomic bombs. Paul and his classmate/girlfriend Jenny Anderman, an aspiring journalist, want to expose Medatomics for what they believe it to be as there was no community notification about operating a potentially dangerous nuclear facility there. While Jenny wants to go the traditional route in writing an exposé, Paul believes there is only one effective way to get their message across to the world while making them both famous. The further Paul, with Jenny's help, gets to enacting his plan to its intended end, the more he may place their lives and that of the community in danger, especially if the authorities discover what he is doing.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
The Manhattan Project (1986) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 30%, Tension 25%, Curiosity 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Tension, Curiosity. Genres: Thriller, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Tension and Curiosity. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 63/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Fear
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Fear | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 20 % | 12 % | 43 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Humor | 45 % | 13 % | 6 % | 31 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 44 % | 10 % | 3 % | 34 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 21 % | 8 % | 51 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 40 % | 16 % | 56 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Tension | 56 % | 51 % | 20 % | 41 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Tension | 49 % | 48 % | 18 % | 24 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Humor | 49 % | 41 % | 18 % | 26 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Curiosity | 55 % | 44 % | 26 % | 41 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 58 % | 51 % | 30 % | 45 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Humor | 59 % | 55 % | 25 % | 41 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 61 % | 58 % | 26 % | 38 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Tension | 64 % | 63 % | 34 % | 34 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Tension | 68 % | 68 % | 41 % | 31 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Tension | 75 % | 75 % | 52 % | 29 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Tension | 83 % | 83 % | 64 % | 28 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Tension | 86 % | 86 % | 69 % | 28 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Tension | 90 % | 90 % | 74 % | 28 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Tension | 89 % | 77 % | 61 % | 24 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 115′ | Relief | 82 % | 52 % | 33 % | 17 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about The Manhattan Project. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about The Manhattan Project — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Eccles (as John David Cullum)
Roland (as Abe Unger)
Government Aide
Jenny's Parent
Day Attendant
General
Details
- Directed by
- Marshall Brickman
- Written by
- Marshall Brickman, Thomas Baum
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1986
- Runtime
- 118 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Anxiety
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





