Wildcats
1986 · 106 min · Director: Michael Ritchie
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Molly is a high school track coach who knows just as much about football as anyone else on the planet. When the football coach's position becomes vacant, she applies for the job, despite expecting sniggers from fellow staff members and her former husband.
Emotional fingerprint
Wildcats (1986) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Inspiration 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Inspiration25%
- Excitement20%
- Anger10%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Inspiration, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Sport. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Inspiration and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Hope
- Tension
- Humor
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Sympathy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Hope | Tension | Humor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 37 % | 18 % | 8 % | 32 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Hope | 39 % | 29 % | 14 % | 29 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Hope | 41 % | 30 % | 23 % | 28 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Sympathy | 43 % | 20 % | 31 % | 25 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Sympathy | 44 % | 21 % | 35 % | 26 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Hope | 45 % | 29 % | 34 % | 30 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Sympathy | 44 % | 26 % | 34 % | 25 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Tension | 45 % | 23 % | 35 % | 20 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Sympathy | 46 % | 21 % | 33 % | 24 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Humor | 45 % | 24 % | 30 % | 34 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Humor | 48 % | 26 % | 34 % | 39 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Tension | 49 % | 25 % | 38 % | 35 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Joy | 49 % | 24 % | 39 % | 30 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Tension | 51 % | 23 % | 43 % | 26 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Hope | 55 % | 23 % | 48 % | 28 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Tension | 59 % | 19 % | 50 % | 31 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Sympathy | 59 % | 25 % | 48 % | 30 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Hope | 60 % | 43 % | 50 % | 26 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Joy | 60 % | 41 % | 51 % | 30 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Joy | 55 % | 27 % | 43 % | 37 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Marian Needham
Ben Edwards
Phillip Finch
Doctor
Details
- Directed by
- Michael Ritchie
- Written by
- Ezra Sacks
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1986
- Runtime
- 106 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
