Paul Bunyan
1958 · 17 min · Director: Les Clark
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A retelling of the classic Canadian / American tall tale of the enormous lumberjack and his loyal companion, an equally huge blue ox.
Emotional fingerprint
Paul Bunyan (1958) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 35%, Humor 30%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Awe35%
- Humor30%
- Excitement20%
- Inspiration15%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Humor, Excitement. Genres: Animation, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Humor and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 7.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Chorus (voice) (as The Mellomen)
Joe Muffaw (voice)
Details
- Directed by
- Les Clark
- Written by
- Ted Berman, Lance Nolley
- Type
- Animation
- Released
- 1958
- Runtime
- 17 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
