Problem Child 2
1991 · 90 min · Director: Brian Levant
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Junior's back in his first adventure since his last! Junior and Ben move to Mortville which seems like the perfect town to live in. The Healys have a nice new house--and Junior get's a cool new room! And young women have formed a line at Ben's door in order to get a piece of him (romantically). Ben does feel he should get remarried so Junior can have a mom, so while Junior adjusts to his new school which includes a little girl who's as bratty as Junior and a teenage brain-dead ignoramous bully in Junior's sixth grade class, Ben finds some dates, which Junior sends running for the hills, in the meantime Junior pulls his infamous tricks on people: blowing up barbecues, taping the bully to the chalkboard, videotaping his babysitter and her boyfriend having sex and broadcasting it for the whole neighborhood to see, same old same old. Meanwhile, Ben meets the gorgeous school nurse (after the school's satellite dish get's pushed on his head) and they, well he, believes it's love at first site, until he meets LaWanda Dumore, a greedy business women who wants to marry Ben and send Junior to boarding school--in Baghdad! So Junior and his new friend, Trixie, must get rid of LaWanda (any way possible!) to bring their parents together!
Emotional fingerprint
Problem Child 2 (1991) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 45%, Excitement 20%, Surprise 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor45%
- Excitement20%
- Surprise15%
- Love10%
- Happiness10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Surprise. Genres: Comedy, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 5.0/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Joy
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Joy | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Joy | 52 % | 35 % | 38 % | 18 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 51 % | 45 % | 23 % | 16 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 54 % | 53 % | 14 % | 16 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 53 % | 50 % | 16 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 53 % | 50 % | 18 % | 14 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 51 % | 49 % | 16 % | 14 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 44 % | 41 % | 11 % | 19 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 43 % | 40 % | 9 % | 26 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Humor | 46 % | 44 % | 16 % | 27 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 50 % | 43 % | 21 % | 30 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Empathy | 53 % | 41 % | 16 % | 33 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Humor | 54 % | 48 % | 11 % | 21 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Humor | 56 % | 53 % | 9 % | 18 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Humor | 54 % | 50 % | 9 % | 20 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Humor | 50 % | 48 % | 14 % | 18 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Humor | 51 % | 48 % | 21 % | 24 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Humor | 54 % | 48 % | 24 % | 26 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Humor | 60 % | 50 % | 33 % | 25 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Joy | 67 % | 53 % | 50 % | 32 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Junior Healy
Trixie Young
Emily
Dolly
Madison
Animal Control Guy
Animal Control Guy
Rhoda
Scuzzy Boyfriend
Details
- Directed by
- Brian Levant
- Written by
- Scott Alexander, Larry Karaszewski
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1991
- Runtime
- 90 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
