It Takes Two
1995 · 101 min · Director: Andy Tennant
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Alyssa (a rich girl) and Amanda (an orphan) are two little girls who are identical, but complete strangers, that accidentally meet one day. Together they form a plan to try getting Alyssa's father to prevent making the biggest mistake of his life: marrying an awful woman.
Emotional fingerprint
It Takes Two (1995) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Love 25%, Hope 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Love25%
- Hope20%
- Empathy15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Hope. Genres: Comedy, Romance, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Hope. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 62/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Hope
- Joy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Hope | Joy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 47 % | 35 % | 19 % | 25 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Empathy | 49 % | 28 % | 31 % | 23 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Joy | 47 % | 27 % | 28 % | 22 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Empathy | 48 % | 35 % | 13 % | 19 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 50 % | 45 % | 10 % | 22 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 52 % | 52 % | 13 % | 28 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 53 % | 53 % | 14 % | 28 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Empathy | 51 % | 44 % | 23 % | 30 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Hope | 53 % | 37 % | 33 % | 31 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 57 % | 36 % | 34 % | 25 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Humor | 51 % | 38 % | 35 % | 20 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Hope | 51 % | 46 % | 36 % | 33 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Humor | 59 % | 54 % | 35 % | 45 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Hope | 59 % | 45 % | 31 % | 30 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 62 % | 28 % | 26 % | 10 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 65 % | 26 % | 35 % | 8 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 66 % | 35 % | 48 % | 13 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Tension | 74 % | 46 % | 55 % | 32 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Joy | 72 % | 49 % | 51 % | 54 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Joy | 58 % | 43 % | 38 % | 54 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Carmen
Frankie
Tiny
Patty
Anthony
Wanda
Michelle
Jerry
Emily
Blue Team Kid
Bernard Louffier
Muffy Bilderberg
Details
- Directed by
- Andy Tennant
- Written by
- Deborah Dean Davis
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1995
- Runtime
- 101 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
