feeldb

The Last Supper

1995 · 92 min · Director: Stacy Title ★ IMDb 6.7 · 16,551 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Jude, Luke, Marc, Paulie and Pete are liberal-minded roommates and grad students at a Iowa post-secondary institution. Every Sunday for the past year, they have hosted a dinner party, inviting a friend over to have an open-minded discussion about whatever topics are of interest. On a dark and stormy night when Pete was supposed to bring a friend for one of those dinners, he instead comes home with Zachary Cody, who rescued a stranded Pete whose car broke down. They invite Zach to stay for dinner instead of Pete's missing friend. They soon find out that Zach is among other things a racist neo-Nazi, which brings up a potentially dangerous situation for Jewish Marc and black Luke. After some physical altercations and verbal threats, Marc ends up stabbing Zach dead out of what he considers self-defense. As the friends discuss what to do about Zach, they finally come to the conclusion that in killing Zach, they have done society a service. So they ponder 'why not invite other ultra-conservatives with extreme views to dinner to do the same to them'? Several dinner parties and deaths later, they think they've hit the jackpot when they meet powerful ultra-conservative broadcaster Norman Arbuthnot, who they invite for dinner. But the friends' plans start to unravel when they can't agree on whether certain of their guests deserve to die. It is also threatened by Sheriff Alice Stanley, who is not looking for the five's victims, but is nevertheless nosing around as she works on a missing girl case.

Trailer for The Last Supper

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

The Last Supper (1995) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Anxiety 25%, Anger 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

30%Humor
20%Anger
  1. Humor30%
  2. Anger20%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Anxiety, Anger. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Crime. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Anxiety and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Disturbing
  • Curiosity

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Joy

Tension
Disturbing
Curiosity
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then rises around 13 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionDisturbingCuriosity
2.5 %≈ 2′Humor32 %13 %10 %22 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Humor39 %23 %14 %24 %
12.5 %≈ 12′Tension59 %51 %40 %24 %
17.5 %≈ 16′Tension78 %74 %68 %23 %
22.5 %≈ 21′Disturbing75 %64 %69 %28 %
27.5 %≈ 25′Disturbing67 %50 %63 %35 %
32.5 %≈ 30′Disturbing72 %61 %68 %36 %
37.5 %≈ 35′Disturbing77 %71 %71 %31 %
42.5 %≈ 39′Disturbing72 %66 %64 %29 %
47.5 %≈ 44′Tension61 %56 %49 %31 %
52.5 %≈ 48′Tension54 %50 %40 %33 %
57.5 %≈ 53′Tension63 %59 %51 %36 %
62.5 %≈ 58′Disturbing68 %64 %60 %36 %
67.5 %≈ 62′Tension61 %56 %49 %33 %
72.5 %≈ 67′Tension55 %48 %32 %38 %
77.5 %≈ 71′Curiosity53 %41 %24 %46 %
82.5 %≈ 76′Curiosity64 %54 %40 %48 %
87.5 %≈ 81′Disturbing81 %75 %69 %40 %
92.5 %≈ 85′Tension80 %62 %60 %27 %
97.5 %≈ 90′Joy67 %29 %28 %15 %
Man in a hole

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Jason Alexander

Anti-Enviroment

Nora Dunn

Sheriff Alice Stanley

Charles Durning

Reverend Gerald Hutchens

BE
Bryn Erin

Heather

Mark Harmon

Dominant Male

Bill Paxton

Zachary Cody

Ron Perlman

Norman Arbuthnot

DR
Dan Rosen

Deputy Hartford

AT
Amber Taylor

Girl in Coffee Shop

MC
Matt Cooper

Jerk in Coffee Shop

GS
Gil Segel

Iowa Resident at Door

RC
Rachel Chagall

Abortion Activist

WH
Warren Hutcherson

Nation Man

NS
Nicholas Sadler

Homeless Basher

SW
Stephen Welch

Tow Truck Guy

Details

Directed by
Stacy Title
Written by
Dan Rosen
Type
Movies
Released
1995
Runtime
92 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.7 · 16,551 ratings
Feels mostly
Humor
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.