The Last Supper
1995 · 92 min · Director: Stacy Title
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Jude, Luke, Marc, Paulie and Pete are liberal-minded roommates and grad students at a Iowa post-secondary institution. Every Sunday for the past year, they have hosted a dinner party, inviting a friend over to have an open-minded discussion about whatever topics are of interest. On a dark and stormy night when Pete was supposed to bring a friend for one of those dinners, he instead comes home with Zachary Cody, who rescued a stranded Pete whose car broke down. They invite Zach to stay for dinner instead of Pete's missing friend. They soon find out that Zach is among other things a racist neo-Nazi, which brings up a potentially dangerous situation for Jewish Marc and black Luke. After some physical altercations and verbal threats, Marc ends up stabbing Zach dead out of what he considers self-defense. As the friends discuss what to do about Zach, they finally come to the conclusion that in killing Zach, they have done society a service. So they ponder 'why not invite other ultra-conservatives with extreme views to dinner to do the same to them'? Several dinner parties and deaths later, they think they've hit the jackpot when they meet powerful ultra-conservative broadcaster Norman Arbuthnot, who they invite for dinner. But the friends' plans start to unravel when they can't agree on whether certain of their guests deserve to die. It is also threatened by Sheriff Alice Stanley, who is not looking for the five's victims, but is nevertheless nosing around as she works on a missing girl case.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
The Last Supper (1995) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Anxiety 25%, Anger 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Anxiety25%
- Anger20%
- Confusion15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Anxiety, Anger. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Anxiety and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Disturbing
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Disturbing | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 32 % | 13 % | 10 % | 22 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 39 % | 23 % | 14 % | 24 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Tension | 59 % | 51 % | 40 % | 24 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Tension | 78 % | 74 % | 68 % | 23 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Disturbing | 75 % | 64 % | 69 % | 28 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Disturbing | 67 % | 50 % | 63 % | 35 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Disturbing | 72 % | 61 % | 68 % | 36 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Disturbing | 77 % | 71 % | 71 % | 31 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Disturbing | 72 % | 66 % | 64 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Tension | 61 % | 56 % | 49 % | 31 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 54 % | 50 % | 40 % | 33 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Tension | 63 % | 59 % | 51 % | 36 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Disturbing | 68 % | 64 % | 60 % | 36 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 61 % | 56 % | 49 % | 33 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Tension | 55 % | 48 % | 32 % | 38 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 41 % | 24 % | 46 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Curiosity | 64 % | 54 % | 40 % | 48 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Disturbing | 81 % | 75 % | 69 % | 40 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Tension | 80 % | 62 % | 60 % | 27 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Joy | 67 % | 29 % | 28 % | 15 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Heather
Deputy Hartford
Girl in Coffee Shop
Jerk in Coffee Shop
Iowa Resident at Door
Abortion Activist
Nation Man
Tow Truck Guy
Details
- Directed by
- Stacy Title
- Written by
- Dan Rosen
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1995
- Runtime
- 92 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





