Moonlight and Valentino
1995 · 100 min · Director: David Anspaugh
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
College poetry professor and poet Rebecca Trager Lott's husband Ben Lott has just died in a freak accident. Rebecca's support during this difficult time consists of her best friend Sylvie Morrow, her sister Lucy Trager, and her ex-stepmother Alberta Trager. Earth mother Sylvie is dealing with what she sees as the probable end of her own marriage to her husband Paul Morrow. Chain smoking Lucy is a directionless and insecure woman who is still mourning their mother's death fourteen years earlier from cancer. And Wall Street executive Alberta, who Lucy in particular doesn't like in her life (especially as Alberta and their father have since divorced) is a domineering but admittedly efficient woman who treats her personal life as an extension of her professional life. As time progresses and each woman deals with her own issues while trying to help Rebecca, a hunky house painter who they have nicknamed "Valentino" enters their collective lives. "Valentino" profoundly affects each of their lives, at the same time that Rebecca, the only one who is seen as having had the perfect marriage, provides what they hope is sage advice for their issues. What comes into question is the appropriate time that Rebecca is allowed to feel sorry for herself. She makes an admission about her marriage and about "Valentino" that may provide the answer.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Moonlight and Valentino (1995) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Sadness 30%, Empathy 25%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Sadness30%
- Empathy25%
- Love20%
- Melancholy15%
- Hope10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Sadness, Empathy, Love. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Sadness, Empathy and Love. Its IMDb rating of 5.7/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 60/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Empathy
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Empathy | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Sadness | 58 % | 48 % | 42 % | 17 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Sadness | 73 % | 68 % | 61 % | 16 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Sadness | 79 % | 76 % | 73 % | 23 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Sadness | 79 % | 77 % | 74 % | 29 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Sadness | 75 % | 74 % | 70 % | 27 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Sadness | 65 % | 55 % | 58 % | 25 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 56 % | 35 % | 45 % | 24 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Humor | 54 % | 25 % | 38 % | 23 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 60 % | 30 % | 41 % | 25 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Sadness | 66 % | 49 % | 55 % | 29 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Sadness | 66 % | 48 % | 54 % | 31 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Humor | 57 % | 23 % | 36 % | 32 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Love | 50 % | 18 % | 35 % | 33 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Empathy | 55 % | 30 % | 45 % | 38 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Love | 61 % | 23 % | 41 % | 48 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Humor | 66 % | 25 % | 44 % | 50 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Empathy | 74 % | 53 % | 63 % | 43 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Sadness | 82 % | 76 % | 75 % | 38 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Sadness | 89 % | 85 % | 81 % | 46 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Sadness | 91 % | 87 % | 85 % | 58 % |
Icarus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Moonlight and Valentino. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Moonlight and Valentino — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Jenny Morrow
Details
- Directed by
- David Anspaugh
- Written by
- Ellen Simon
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1995
- Runtime
- 100 min
- Country
- United Kingdom, United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Sadness
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





