Croupier
1998 · 94 min · Director: Mike Hodges
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
An aspiring writer is hired as a croupier at a casino, where he realizes that his life as a croupier would make a great novel.
Emotional fingerprint
Croupier (1998) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 32%, Anxiety 25%, Curiosity 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension32%
- Anxiety25%
- Curiosity20%
- Confusion13%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Anxiety, Curiosity. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Anxiety and Curiosity. Its IMDb rating of 7.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Surprise
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 33 % | 20 % | 38 % | 7 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 34 % | 24 % | 38 % | 4 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 27 % | 36 % | 8 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Empathy | 40 % | 26 % | 34 % | 14 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Curiosity | 36 % | 24 % | 30 % | 14 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Sadness | 35 % | 28 % | 26 % | 11 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Tension | 44 % | 41 % | 26 % | 13 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Tension | 53 % | 53 % | 29 % | 15 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Tension | 54 % | 50 % | 31 % | 14 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Empathy | 50 % | 43 % | 34 % | 18 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Tension | 46 % | 40 % | 38 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 39 % | 41 % | 19 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 46 % | 45 % | 10 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Tension | 57 % | 56 % | 48 % | 13 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 55 % | 55 % | 45 % | 16 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 57 % | 57 % | 41 % | 13 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 69 % | 63 % | 39 % | 26 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Sadness | 70 % | 53 % | 41 % | 45 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 35 % | 44 % | 34 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Surprise | 57 % | 27 % | 38 % | 20 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
David Reynolds
Matt
Giles Cremorne
Barber
Manicurist
Details
- Directed by
- Mike Hodges
- Written by
- Paul Mayersberg
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1998
- Runtime
- 94 min
- Country
- United Kingdom, Ireland, France, Germany
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
