feeldb

Water Drops on Burning Rocks

2000 · 86 min · Director: François Ozon ★ IMDb 6.7 · 7,358 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Germany in the 1970s. Whilst waiting for his girlfriend, a young student, Franz, allows himself to be picked up by 50-year old businessman, Léopold. In his apartment, Léopold provokes Franz into revealing his homosexual experiences and soon manages to seduce him. Six months later, Frantz has moved in with Léopold and they appear to live as an ordinary married couple. The strain is beginning to show, however, and after a row Frantz threatens to leave. Whilst Léopold is away, Frantz is visited by his former girlfriend, Anna, and their romance is soon rekindled. Before the two lovers can escape, Léopold returns and his charms persuade Anna to stay. Léopold's ex-lover Vera then makes an unexpected appearance and the menagerie is complete...

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Water Drops on Burning Rocks

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Water Drops on Burning Rocks (2000) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 30%, Anxiety 25%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Love20%
  2. Humor15%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Anxiety, Love. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Anxiety and Love. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Sadness
  • Empathy
  • Tension

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Sadness
Empathy
Tension
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then rises around 78 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensitySadnessEmpathyTension
2.5 %≈ 2′Curiosity42 %3 %10 %18 %
7.5 %≈ 6′Curiosity44 %10 %17 %19 %
12.5 %≈ 11′Curiosity46 %14 %26 %20 %
17.5 %≈ 15′Curiosity50 %15 %30 %28 %
22.5 %≈ 19′Tension51 %25 %35 %39 %
27.5 %≈ 24′Sadness53 %38 %41 %42 %
32.5 %≈ 28′Sadness57 %40 %41 %45 %
37.5 %≈ 32′Tension60 %36 %41 %54 %
42.5 %≈ 37′Tension62 %42 %46 %57 %
47.5 %≈ 41′Sadness63 %54 %53 %47 %
52.5 %≈ 45′Sadness62 %51 %56 %33 %
57.5 %≈ 49′Empathy55 %35 %50 %29 %
62.5 %≈ 54′Empathy55 %30 %44 %40 %
67.5 %≈ 58′Tension61 %31 %41 %54 %
72.5 %≈ 62′Tension68 %41 %47 %53 %
77.5 %≈ 67′Sadness79 %67 %68 %52 %
82.5 %≈ 71′Sadness88 %84 %78 %62 %
87.5 %≈ 75′Sadness89 %85 %74 %63 %
92.5 %≈ 80′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
97.5 %≈ 84′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Water Drops on Burning Rocks. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Water Drops on Burning Rocks — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Details

Directed by
François Ozon
Type
Movies
Released
2000
Runtime
86 min
Country
France
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.7 · 7,358 ratings
Feels mostly
Confusion
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.