Filantropica
2002 · 110 min · Director: Nae Caranfil
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Ovidiu, a high-school teacher looking for an extra buck, finds an unexpected way to earn easy money.
Emotional fingerprint
Filantropica (2002) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Confusion 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Confusion25%
- Empathy20%
- Anger10%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Confusion, Empathy. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Confusion and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 8.4/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 75/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Tension
- Melancholy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Melancholy
Dominant emotion: Surprise
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Tension | Melancholy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 47 % | 43 % | 35 % | 13 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 48 % | 46 % | 32 % | 18 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Humor | 45 % | 45 % | 26 % | 20 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Humor | 44 % | 44 % | 20 % | 23 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 48 % | 48 % | 18 % | 28 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Humor | 54 % | 53 % | 21 % | 27 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 56 % | 54 % | 26 % | 20 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Humor | 55 % | 54 % | 30 % | 11 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Humor | 55 % | 55 % | 33 % | 6 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Humor | 51 % | 51 % | 31 % | 6 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Humor | 50 % | 50 % | 29 % | 11 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Humor | 51 % | 50 % | 28 % | 14 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Humor | 48 % | 44 % | 27 % | 14 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Humor | 51 % | 39 % | 36 % | 18 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Tension | 59 % | 40 % | 50 % | 18 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Humor | 59 % | 49 % | 51 % | 14 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Humor | 57 % | 51 % | 46 % | 19 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Melancholy | 57 % | 44 % | 38 % | 34 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Surprise | 60 % | 45 % | 25 % | 44 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 107′ | Humor | 62 % | 52 % | 18 % | 45 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Filantropica. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Diana Dobrovicescu
Simpaticul
Poetul Gării de Nord
Robert Dobrovicescu
El însuși
Tatăl
Mama
Recuperator #1
Cântăreț Karaoke
Reporter
Băiat de Băiat
Details
- Directed by
- Nae Caranfil
- Written by
- Nae Caranfil
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2002
- Runtime
- 110 min
- Country
- Romania, France
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
