feeldb

The In-Laws

2003 · 98 min · Director: Andrew Fleming, Andrew Fleming ★ IMDb 5.8 · 18,463 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

In four days, Jerry Peyser and Steve Tobias will become in-laws when their respective offspring, Melissa Peyser and Mark Tobias, get married. Married Jerry is a Chicago area podiatrist. He is risk averse to an extreme, afraid of heights including being in tall buildings and flying, even watching airline commercials. He is also extremely controlling, having organized the lavish wedding against the simple affair Melissa had envisioned. He is aggravated that he has not yet met Steve, who has missed one family function after another. Divorced Steve is a photocopy machine salesman... or so Mark says. In reality, Steve is a deep undercover CIA field agent, something that Mark knows but is unable to divulge to anyone, even Tracy and her family. His work, which has always overtaken his life, is the reason Steve has missed all these family events. Steve is unwilling to hand over reigns of his cases to his junior partner, the capable Angela Harris. Steve finally meets the Peysers, which Steve manipulates into an undercover work dinner. Steve's current mission involves setting up the sale of twenty year old runaway "Olga" to a French arms dealer, violent Jean-Pierre Thibodoux, which is purely a cover to obtain information clandestinely from Thibodoux. Jerry inadvertently gets embroiled in Steve's case when he overhears the beginning of the deal going down. Jerry does not believe Steve to be one of "the good guys", especially as he learns that the FBI is after Steve, who they believe has become a rogue agent. This belief may affect not only their time together, but their lives and whether Melissa and Mark will get married. Thrown into the mix is Mark's mother/Steve's ex-wife, Judy Tobias, who hates almost everything about her ex-husband except one thing...

Trailer for The In-Laws

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

The In-Laws (2003) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 32%, Excitement 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Humor32%
  2. Relief10%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Anxiety. Genres: Thriller, Comedy, Action. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 5.8/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 60/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitlesapproximate
  • Humor
  • Tension
  • Love

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Relief

Dominant emotion: Love

Humor
Tension
Love
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityHumorTensionLove
2.5 %≈ 2′Humor43 %35 %35 %5 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Tension48 %39 %33 %11 %
12.5 %≈ 12′Humor50 %46 %24 %15 %
17.5 %≈ 17′Humor53 %45 %31 %14 %
22.5 %≈ 22′Tension57 %40 %48 %9 %
27.5 %≈ 27′Humor59 %46 %48 %4 %
32.5 %≈ 32′Humor58 %53 %43 %3 %
37.5 %≈ 37′Humor55 %50 %41 %1 %
42.5 %≈ 42′Humor54 %51 %36 %1 %
47.5 %≈ 47′Humor61 %55 %41 %6 %
52.5 %≈ 51′Tension65 %51 %51 %11 %
57.5 %≈ 56′Humor63 %48 %53 %10 %
62.5 %≈ 61′Tension60 %45 %53 %10 %
67.5 %≈ 66′Humor56 %45 %50 %14 %
72.5 %≈ 71′Humor61 %49 %54 %15 %
77.5 %≈ 76′Tension70 %49 %63 %23 %
82.5 %≈ 81′Relief74 %46 %49 %43 %
87.5 %≈ 86′Love75 %43 %22 %60 %
92.5 %≈ 91′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
97.5 %≈ 96′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Candice Bergen

Judy Tobias

Lindsay Sloane

Melissa Peyser

MR
Maria Ricossa

Katherine Peyser

MB
Michael Bodnar

Bodyguard

VR
Vladimir Radian

Cherkasov

Robin Tunney

Angela Harris

SA
Susan Aceron

Nurse

CT
Chang Tseng

Quan Le

TG
Tamara Gorski

Yadira

Boyd Banks

Patient

David Suchet

Jean-Pierre Thibodoux

AR
A. Russell Andrews

Agent Will Hutchins

Aaron Abrams

Student

MB
Matt Birman

Agent at Restaurant

RW
Richard Waugh

Agent Thorn

Details

Type
Movies
Released
2003
Runtime
98 min
Country
United States, Germany, Canada
Ratings
★ IMDb 5.8 · 18,463 ratings
Feels mostly
Humor
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.