Beauty Shop
2005 · 105 min · Director: Bille Woodruff
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
You thought you'd heard it all in the barbershop, but you haven't heard anything yet - the women get their own chance to shampoo, shine, and speak their minds in Beauty Shop.
Emotional fingerprint
Beauty Shop (2005) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 40%, Joy 25%, Empathy 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor40%
- Joy25%
- Empathy15%
- Love10%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Joy, Empathy. Genres: Comedy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Joy and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 5.7/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Joy
- Hope
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Joy | Hope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 52 % | 50 % | 25 % | 20 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 51 % | 41 % | 16 % | 28 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Tension | 57 % | 35 % | 20 % | 39 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Joy | 60 % | 39 % | 36 % | 46 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 51 % | 41 % | 32 % | 39 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 46 % | 43 % | 21 % | 23 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 51 % | 50 % | 23 % | 16 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Humor | 53 % | 49 % | 21 % | 18 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Tension | 49 % | 41 % | 16 % | 14 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Humor | 51 % | 46 % | 23 % | 15 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Humor | 55 % | 46 % | 30 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Tension | 54 % | 40 % | 23 % | 23 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Humor | 54 % | 44 % | 18 % | 16 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Humor | 56 % | 44 % | 29 % | 25 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Hope | 61 % | 39 % | 45 % | 41 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Joy | 66 % | 31 % | 44 % | 40 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Sadness | 69 % | 24 % | 38 % | 36 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Joy | 70 % | 33 % | 49 % | 44 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Humor | 66 % | 45 % | 54 % | 45 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Joy | 62 % | 45 % | 52 % | 45 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Paulette
Vanessa
Willie
Rochelle
Darnelle
Denise
Catfish Rita
James
Details
- Directed by
- Bille Woodruff
- Written by
- Kate Lanier, Elizabeth Hunter, Norman Vance Jr.
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2005
- Runtime
- 105 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Comedy
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
