Junebug
2005 · 106 min · Director: Phil Morrison
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Successful Carolinian George Johnsten meets Chicago art gallery owner Madeleine at an electoral benefit art auction- love at first sight. Madeleine decides to meet a Southern original artist, so George seizes the opportunity to come along and present her to his North Carolina parents Eugene and Peg, drop-out brother Johny and his high-pregnant wife Ashley. Confronting the outsider soon opens a can of worms as emotions revive or emerge, like admiration and jealousy.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Junebug (2005) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 33%, Anxiety 25%, Humor 22%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Anxiety, Humor. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Anxiety and Humor. Its IMDb rating of 6.9/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Empathy
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Empathy | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 33 % | 2 % | 7 % | 5 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 34 % | 4 % | 9 % | 9 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 38 % | 5 % | 11 % | 19 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Humor | 38 % | 6 % | 15 % | 24 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Curiosity | 35 % | 8 % | 18 % | 18 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 36 % | 6 % | 15 % | 14 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 36 % | 6 % | 11 % | 19 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Curiosity | 35 % | 10 % | 15 % | 20 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Empathy | 34 % | 13 % | 25 % | 15 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Empathy | 36 % | 14 % | 32 % | 21 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 49 % | 23 % | 39 % | 41 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Tension | 57 % | 28 % | 39 % | 53 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Tension | 56 % | 19 % | 31 % | 51 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Tension | 54 % | 13 % | 25 % | 48 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Tension | 54 % | 24 % | 29 % | 41 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Sadness | 66 % | 54 % | 51 % | 36 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Sadness | 73 % | 68 % | 63 % | 35 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Sadness | 57 % | 49 % | 48 % | 31 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Empathy | 48 % | 38 % | 43 % | 21 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Sadness | 53 % | 43 % | 50 % | 15 % |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Bernadette
Scout who goes in
Lucille, the neighbor
Sissy, David Wark's sister
Bud, young pastor
Hollerin' Man
Hollerin' Man
Gallery Assistant
Gallery Assistant
Details
- Directed by
- Phil Morrison
- Written by
- Angus MacLachlan
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2005
- Runtime
- 106 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Empathy
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





