The Stanford Prison Experiment
2015 · 122 min · Director: Kyle Patrick Alvarez
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In 1971, twenty-four male students are selected to take on randomly assigned roles of prisoners and guards in a mock prison situated in the basement of the Stanford psychology building.
Emotional fingerprint
The Stanford Prison Experiment (2015) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 35%, Disturbing 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Anxiety35%
- Disturbing25%
- Tension20%
- Anger10%
- Confusion10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Disturbing, Tension. Genres: Drama, History, Biography. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Disturbing and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Disturbing
- Tension
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Disturbing | Tension | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 32 % | 7 % | 23 % | 10 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Tension | 35 % | 15 % | 29 % | 14 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Tension | 37 % | 23 % | 34 % | 21 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Tension | 41 % | 29 % | 38 % | 26 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Tension | 48 % | 39 % | 45 % | 34 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Tension | 57 % | 50 % | 54 % | 43 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Tension | 66 % | 60 % | 64 % | 50 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Tension | 74 % | 67 % | 73 % | 54 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Tension | 80 % | 74 % | 77 % | 62 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Disturbing | 81 % | 77 % | 73 % | 68 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Disturbing | 74 % | 70 % | 60 % | 64 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Empathy | 71 % | 65 % | 55 % | 64 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Disturbing | 77 % | 73 % | 62 % | 68 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Disturbing | 76 % | 75 % | 60 % | 64 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Disturbing | 69 % | 67 % | 54 % | 56 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Disturbing | 71 % | 69 % | 58 % | 55 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Disturbing | 82 % | 80 % | 68 % | 67 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 107′ | Disturbing | 88 % | 86 % | 67 % | 75 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 113′ | Disturbing | 82 % | 81 % | 51 % | 65 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 119′ | Disturbing | 74 % | 73 % | 36 % | 51 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Kyle Patrick Alvarez
- Written by
- Tim Talbott, Philip Zimbardo
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2015
- Runtime
- 122 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Anxiety
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
