Interview
2007 · 84 min · Director: Steve Buscemi, Steve Buscemi
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Everyone wants a piece of a celebrity. Pierre is a political reporter, assigned to write a fluff piece on Katya, a blond who acts in slasher movies and a Fox show about single girls in the city. The interview, at a restaurant, goes badly: she's late, he's unprepared and rude. After leaving, he bangs his head in a fender bender and she takes him to her loft to clean the wound. Lubricated by alcohol and competitive natures, the interview resumes. She takes phone calls from her fiancé, Pierre reads her diary on her computer. They discuss wounds, he expresses concern, father-daughter feelings arise. Out come camcorders to tape their darkest secrets. Is friendship or more in the offing?
Emotional fingerprint
Interview (2007) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 30%, Curiosity 25%, Humor 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Curiosity, Humor. Genres: Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Curiosity and Humor. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Tension
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Tension | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 30 % | 25 % | 20 % | 1 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Humor | 36 % | 26 % | 29 % | 3 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Tension | 44 % | 30 % | 41 % | 8 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Tension | 45 % | 35 % | 39 % | 11 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 38 % | 28 % | 7 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 39 % | 25 % | 5 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 40 % | 29 % | 7 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Humor | 44 % | 39 % | 34 % | 9 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 54 % | 36 % | 39 % | 26 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Disturbing | 65 % | 41 % | 42 % | 49 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Curiosity | 61 % | 50 % | 42 % | 46 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 50 % | 40 % | 36 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Sadness | 62 % | 47 % | 42 % | 32 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Tension | 67 % | 49 % | 56 % | 31 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Tension | 70 % | 56 % | 64 % | 36 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Sadness | 68 % | 59 % | 54 % | 32 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Sadness | 69 % | 57 % | 51 % | 40 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Disturbing | 78 % | 58 % | 63 % | 59 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 81 % | 60 % | 71 % | 61 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Interview. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Maggie
Waitress
Autograph Seeker #2
Lady in the Limo
Maitre'd
Man in Restaurant
Truck Driver
Hunky Actor
Fan at Restaurant
Political Pundit
Autograph Seeker #1
Paparazzi
Details
- Directed by
- Steve Buscemi, Steve Buscemi
- Written by
- David Schechter, Theo van Gogh, Theodor Holman, Steve Buscemi
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2007
- Runtime
- 84 min
- Country
- United States, Canada, Netherlands
- Genres
- Drama
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Confusion
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
