Echelon Conspiracy
2009 · 105 min · Director: Greg Marcks
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Max Peterson is a globe-trotting techno-whiz who installs security systems on computers. He receives an anonymous gift: a phone which sends messages that enable him to win at a casino. Max soon finds himself pursed by hit men, the casino's security chief, and a CIA operative. Who's sending Max messages? Previous recipients of similar windfalls have ended up dead. After a couple of close scrapes, Max realizes he's in danger, so he tries to find out the root of the conspiracy - which seems to have access to every security camera in the world - before he's the next victim. Why is this happening to him, and who can he trust?
Emotional fingerprint
Echelon Conspiracy (2009) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 30%, Anxiety 25%, Curiosity 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension30%
- Anxiety25%
- Curiosity20%
- Excitement15%
- Fear10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Anxiety, Curiosity. Genres: Thriller, Crime, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Anxiety and Curiosity. Its IMDb rating of 5.7/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 58/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Tension
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Tension | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 35 % | 16 % | 7 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 35 % | 19 % | 9 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 40 % | 22 % | 7 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Curiosity | 47 % | 48 % | 27 % | 8 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 52 % | 35 % | 13 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Tension | 58 % | 55 % | 48 % | 20 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Curiosity | 59 % | 57 % | 53 % | 22 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Curiosity | 62 % | 58 % | 58 % | 28 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Tension | 62 % | 54 % | 59 % | 32 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 45 % | 54 % | 32 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Tension | 67 % | 47 % | 64 % | 44 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Tension | 68 % | 55 % | 64 % | 42 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 62 % | 53 % | 29 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Curiosity | 67 % | 65 % | 59 % | 33 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Tension | 70 % | 61 % | 68 % | 37 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Curiosity | 71 % | 60 % | 70 % | 39 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Tension | 77 % | 56 % | 77 % | 52 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Tension | 80 % | 41 % | 68 % | 49 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Relief | 76 % | 28 % | 45 % | 28 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Female Casino Tech
Casino Tech
Yuri Malanin
Dennis
NSA Tech #2
Details
- Directed by
- Greg Marcks
- Written by
- Kevin Alyn Elders, Michael Nitsberg
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2009
- Runtime
- 105 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
