John Mulaney & the Sack Lunch Bunch
2019 · 70 min · Director: Rhys Thomas
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
John Mulaney and his kid pals tackle existential topics for all ages with catchy songs, comedy sketches and special guests in a nostalgic variety special.
Emotional fingerprint
John Mulaney & the Sack Lunch Bunch (2019) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Love 20%, Nostalgia 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Nostalgia. Genres: Comedy, Musical, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Nostalgia. Its IMDb rating of 7.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Joy
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Joy | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 62 % | 63 % | 28 % | 32 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 5′ | Humor | 64 % | 68 % | 30 % | 30 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Humor | 66 % | 71 % | 26 % | 30 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 68 % | 71 % | 25 % | 29 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 68 % | 70 % | 30 % | 29 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Humor | 70 % | 74 % | 31 % | 29 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 71 % | 75 % | 25 % | 26 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Humor | 68 % | 70 % | 21 % | 23 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Humor | 63 % | 66 % | 25 % | 21 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 60 % | 65 % | 26 % | 25 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Humor | 63 % | 68 % | 26 % | 25 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Humor | 66 % | 71 % | 28 % | 23 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Humor | 65 % | 69 % | 25 % | 30 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Humor | 60 % | 61 % | 21 % | 38 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Humor | 60 % | 60 % | 20 % | 33 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Humor | 64 % | 64 % | 23 % | 30 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Humor | 69 % | 70 % | 28 % | 33 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Humor | 71 % | 74 % | 30 % | 29 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Humor | 65 % | 56 % | 31 % | 20 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Empathy | 60 % | 33 % | 32 % | 13 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about John Mulaney & the Sack Lunch Bunch. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
David Byrne
Alex
Tyler
Ava
Cordelia
Camille
Oriah
Jake
Orson
Isabella
Jacob
Suri
Zell
Jonah
Details
- Directed by
- Rhys Thomas
- Written by
- John Mulaney, Marika Sawyer, John Mulaney
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2019
- Runtime
- 70 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
