Sky of Love
2007 · 129 min · Director: Natsuki Imai
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Mika is a fresh high school student who starts texting a mysterious boy. She is shocked when he reveals who he is - Hiro, a delinquent attending her school. What she doesn't know is that Hiro isn't as bad as he seems.
Emotional fingerprint
Sky of Love (2007) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Love 35%, Sadness 25%, Nostalgia 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Love, Sadness, Nostalgia. Genres: Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Love, Sadness and Nostalgia. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Love
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Love | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Love | 30 % | 10 % | 23 % | 13 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Love | 32 % | 6 % | 25 % | 14 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Love | 44 % | 10 % | 39 % | 20 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Love | 66 % | 31 % | 49 % | 41 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Empathy | 83 % | 56 % | 43 % | 69 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Empathy | 79 % | 53 % | 46 % | 74 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Love | 73 % | 29 % | 60 % | 59 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Hope | 79 % | 34 % | 59 % | 56 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Sadness | 88 % | 68 % | 46 % | 71 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Sadness | 88 % | 84 % | 41 % | 78 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Sadness | 80 % | 79 % | 39 % | 70 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Sadness | 70 % | 59 % | 39 % | 58 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Hope | 68 % | 44 % | 48 % | 51 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Sadness | 75 % | 59 % | 49 % | 59 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Sadness | 84 % | 76 % | 55 % | 71 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Love | 89 % | 79 % | 76 % | 80 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 106′ | Love | 90 % | 75 % | 85 % | 81 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 113′ | Love | 93 % | 80 % | 80 % | 84 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 119′ | Sadness | 93 % | 85 % | 78 % | 84 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 126′ | Love | 87 % | 77 % | 77 % | 75 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Sky of Love. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Minako
Saki
Nozomu
Aya
Hirokazu Sakurai
Akemi Sakurai
Katsuji Tahara
Ken
Saori Tahara
Details
- Directed by
- Natsuki Imai
- Written by
- Mutsuki Watanabe
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2007
- Runtime
- 129 min
- Country
- Japan
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Love
- Data updated
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
