Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind
2020 · 120 min · Director: Michael Mazzola
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
As the UFO's suddenly hits the covers of Washington Post and NY Times in the age of "fake news" and conspiracy memes, how can we make sense of these revelations without losing grip on reality?. "Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind" is a feature documentary that is presented by the global authority on extraterrestrials who has created the world wide disclosure movement and routinely briefs the presidents and the heads of state on the ET phenomenon: Dr. Steven Greer. His preceding works: Sirius and Unacknowledged, broke crowdfunding records and sparked a grassroots movement. In this film, Dr. Steven Greer presents the most dangerous information that the architects of secrecy do not want you to know; how forgotten spiritual knowledge holds the key to humans initiating with highly advanced ET civilizations. This film features a large amount of groundbreaking video and photographic evidence and supporting interviews from some prominent figures such as legendary civil rights attorney Daniel Sheehan; Adam Curry of Princeton's PEAR Lab and Dr.Russel Targ who headed the CIA's top secret remote viewing program. Their Message: For several thousands of people, contact has begun. This is their story.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind (2020) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 30%, Curiosity 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Confusion30%
- Curiosity25%
- Anxiety20%
- Awe15%
- Disturbing10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Curiosity, Anxiety. Genres: Documentary. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Curiosity and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 63/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Awe
- Curiosity
- Hope
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Awe
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Awe | Curiosity | Hope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 33 % | 55 % | 28 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Hope | 51 % | 31 % | 50 % | 31 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 20 % | 48 % | 20 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 13 % | 44 % | 9 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Tension | 57 % | 16 % | 40 % | 10 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Tension | 59 % | 18 % | 39 % | 13 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Sadness | 56 % | 19 % | 40 % | 19 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 33 % | 50 % | 28 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 40 % | 57 % | 23 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 39 % | 55 % | 20 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Awe | 50 % | 41 % | 50 % | 36 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Hope | 55 % | 46 % | 48 % | 46 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Awe | 57 % | 53 % | 49 % | 38 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Awe | 56 % | 54 % | 49 % | 28 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Awe | 59 % | 57 % | 45 % | 30 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Awe | 61 % | 61 % | 43 % | 39 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Awe | 59 % | 57 % | 43 % | 44 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Awe | 55 % | 49 % | 44 % | 45 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 111′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 38 % | 41 % | 50 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 117′ | Hope | 58 % | 33 % | 33 % | 60 % |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Self
Self
Details
- Directed by
- Michael Mazzola
- Written by
- Michael Mazzola
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2020
- Runtime
- 120 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Documentary
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Confusion
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Data: JustWatch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.




