feeldb

Planet of the Humans

2019 · 100 min · Director: Jeff Gibbs ★ IMDb 6.9 · 3,485 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Planet of the Humans (2019), a documentary that dares to say what no one else will this Earth Day - that we are losing the battle to stop climate change on planet earth because we are following leaders who have taken us down the wrong road - selling out the green movement to wealthy interests and corporate America. This film is the wake-up call to the reality we are afraid to face: that in the midst of a human-caused extinction event, the environmental movement's answer is to push for techno-fixes and band-aids. It's too little, too late. Removed from the debate is the only thing that MIGHT save us: getting a grip on our out-of-control human presence and consumption. Why is this not THE issue? Because that would be bad for profits, bad for business. Have we environmentalists fallen for illusions, "green" illusions, that are anything but green, because we're scared that this is the end-and we've pinned all our hopes on biomass, wind turbines, and electric cars? No amount of batteries are going to save us, warns director Jeff Gibbs (lifelong environmentalist and co-producer of Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004) and Bowling for Columbine (2002)). This urgent, must-see movie, a full-frontal assault on our sacred cows, is guaranteed to generate anger, debate, and, hopefully, a willingness to see our survival in a new way-before it's too late.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Planet of the Humans

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Planet of the Humans (2019) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anger 30%, Anxiety 25%, Confusion 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Anger30%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Anger, Anxiety, Confusion. Genres: Documentary. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Anger, Anxiety and Confusion. Its IMDb rating of 6.9/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Anxiety
  • Disturbing
  • Curiosity

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Anxiety

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Dominant emotion: Anger

Anxiety
Disturbing
Curiosity
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 13 %, then peaks around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityAnxietyDisturbingCuriosity
2.5 %≈ 3′Curiosity53 %44 %27 %57 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Curiosity48 %35 %25 %53 %
12.5 %≈ 13′Curiosity46 %29 %24 %51 %
17.5 %≈ 18′Curiosity51 %38 %32 %50 %
22.5 %≈ 23′Anxiety57 %48 %40 %53 %
27.5 %≈ 28′Curiosity56 %45 %40 %55 %
32.5 %≈ 33′Curiosity55 %42 %43 %48 %
37.5 %≈ 38′Sadness61 %46 %53 %38 %
42.5 %≈ 43′Sadness68 %53 %58 %38 %
47.5 %≈ 48′Anxiety66 %58 %50 %44 %
52.5 %≈ 53′Anxiety60 %54 %42 %48 %
57.5 %≈ 58′Disturbing57 %49 %46 %46 %
62.5 %≈ 63′Disturbing55 %44 %46 %46 %
67.5 %≈ 68′Curiosity57 %40 %42 %51 %
72.5 %≈ 73′Anger62 %38 %44 %54 %
77.5 %≈ 78′Anger68 %39 %51 %47 %
82.5 %≈ 83′Sadness73 %48 %61 %36 %
87.5 %≈ 88′Anger75 %63 %63 %27 %
92.5 %≈ 93′Anxiety76 %71 %64 %18 %
97.5 %≈ 98′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Planet of the Humans. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Planet of the Humans — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

JG
Jeff Gibbs

DJ
David Joos

CD
Chris Dodd

Self (archive footage)

KZ
Kristin Zimmerman

Details

Directed by
Jeff Gibbs
Written by
Jeff Gibbs
Type
Movies
Released
2019
Runtime
100 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.9 · 3,485 ratings
Feels mostly
Anger
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.