Sorority Row
2009 · 101 min · Director: Stewart Hendler
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
"Sorority Row" sees a group of sorority sisters try to cover up the death of their house-sister after a prank gone wrong, only to be stalked by a serial killer.
Emotional fingerprint
Sorority Row (2009) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 30%, Tension 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Tension, Anxiety. Genres: Mystery, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Tension and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 5.2/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Fear
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Fear | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 51 % | 26 % | 14 % | 25 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Tension | 64 % | 51 % | 33 % | 45 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Disturbing | 78 % | 70 % | 45 % | 69 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Disturbing | 71 % | 56 % | 28 % | 62 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 51 % | 34 % | 12 % | 34 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Sadness | 41 % | 30 % | 13 % | 19 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 46 % | 39 % | 24 % | 27 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Disturbing | 56 % | 50 % | 38 % | 41 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Tension | 61 % | 57 % | 44 % | 43 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 61 % | 54 % | 41 % | 39 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Humor | 59 % | 47 % | 35 % | 35 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Tension | 68 % | 61 % | 48 % | 44 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Tension | 80 % | 77 % | 65 % | 60 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 83 % | 81 % | 71 % | 64 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 84 % | 83 % | 74 % | 59 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 84 % | 83 % | 70 % | 54 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 86 % | 85 % | 70 % | 61 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Tension | 89 % | 88 % | 74 % | 70 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Tension | 74 % | 68 % | 57 % | 51 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Sadness | 49 % | 36 % | 27 % | 25 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Jessica Pierson
Megan Blaire
Mickey Donaldson
Senator Tyson
Mrs. Tappan
Maggie Blaire
Danny
Joanna
Riley
Bra-Clad Sister
Details
- Directed by
- Stewart Hendler
- Written by
- Mark Rosman, Josh Stolberg, Pete Goldfinger
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2009
- Runtime
- 101 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Fear
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
