Food, Inc.
2008 · 94 min · Director: Robert Kenner
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
The current method of raw food production is largely a response to the growth of the fast food industry since the 1950s. The production of food overall has more drastically changed since that time than the several thousand years prior. Controlled primarily by a handful of multinational corporations, the global food production business - with an emphasis on the business - has as its unwritten goals production of large quantities of food at low direct inputs (most often subsidized) resulting in enormous profits, which in turn results in greater control of the global supply of food sources within these few companies. Health and safety (of the food itself, of the animals produced themselves, of the workers on the assembly lines, and of the consumers actually eating the food) are often overlooked by the companies, and are often overlooked by government in an effort to provide cheap food regardless of these negative consequences. Many of the changes are based on advancements in science and technology, but often have negative side effects.The products made have been shown in several studies to enlarge male sexual organs and increase male breast size. The answer that the companies have come up with is to throw more science at the problems to bandage the issues but not the root causes. The global food supply may be in crisis with lack of biodiversity, but can be changed on the demand side of the equation.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Food, Inc. (2008) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 35%, Inspiration 20%, Awe 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Anxiety35%
- Inspiration20%
- Awe20%
- Sadness15%
- Hope10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Inspiration, Awe. Genres: Documentary, News. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Inspiration and Awe. Its IMDb rating of 7.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Anger
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Anger
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Anger | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 47 % | 13 % | 28 % | 53 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 19 % | 30 % | 48 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Sadness | 50 % | 30 % | 38 % | 40 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Anger | 49 % | 26 % | 38 % | 43 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 23 % | 33 % | 48 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Tension | 68 % | 46 % | 38 % | 39 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Sadness | 74 % | 64 % | 44 % | 29 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Sadness | 63 % | 55 % | 44 % | 30 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Sadness | 54 % | 44 % | 36 % | 31 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Sadness | 50 % | 35 % | 28 % | 34 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 26 % | 34 % | 38 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Anger | 55 % | 29 % | 48 % | 34 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Anger | 51 % | 24 % | 40 % | 32 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Hope | 48 % | 13 % | 28 % | 38 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 56 % | 19 % | 40 % | 38 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Anger | 63 % | 30 % | 55 % | 34 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Anger | 61 % | 29 % | 55 % | 33 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Anger | 60 % | 28 % | 46 % | 31 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Hope | 60 % | 25 % | 28 % | 24 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Hope | 60 % | 15 % | 10 % | 13 % |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Food, Inc.. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Food, Inc. — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Himself - Tyson Grower
Herself - Perdue Grower
Details
- Directed by
- Robert Kenner
- Written by
- Robert Kenner, Elise Pearlstein, Kim Roberts
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2008
- Runtime
- 94 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Documentary, News
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Anxiety
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





