The Details
2011 · 101 min · Director: Jacob Estes, Jacob Aaron Estes
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In King County, Washington, Dr. Jeff Lang has been married for ten years with Nealy Lang and they have a little boy. Their best friends are Rebecca Mazzoni, who studied with Jeff in the medical school, and her husband Peter Mazzoni. Jeff decides to sod his backyard, but the grass comes with worms underneath and raccoons destroy his sod during the night. Jeff wants also build another room in the house for his planned second son, but the City Hall blocks the project. Jeff decides to build the room without the approval and he gives a beautiful plant for his next door neighbor, the unstable Lila (Laura Linney) that lives with her cat Matthew, expecting that she does not denounce his construction work to the authorities. Jeff also likes to play basketball with his friend Lincoln, who has kidney problem and needs hemodialysis. However, the raccoons disturb Jeff and Nealy has not had sex with him for six months. Jeff decides to poison the raccoon and he meets Rebecca to drink and relief his bitterness about his dried up of sex marriage and they end the day having sex in Rebecca's home. Jeff finds a better work for Lincoln as a coach at a school and he learns that his friend will die soon. Jeff gets close to a breakdown when Peter discovers that his wife betrayed him with Jeff; Matthew is accidentally poisoned by Jeff and Lila seduces him and they have sex. Jeff decides to donate one kidney to save the life of his friend, but when he is recovering from the surgery, he learns that Lila is pregnant and he comments his life with Lincoln. Will Jeff find redemption in his journey to hell?
Emotional fingerprint
The Details (2011) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Anxiety 25%, Confusion 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Anxiety25%
- Confusion20%
- Sadness15%
- Disturbing10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Anxiety, Confusion. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Anxiety and Confusion. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 63/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Disturbing
- Sympathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sympathy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Disturbing | Sympathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 37 % | 25 % | 8 % | 5 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 39 % | 20 % | 6 % | 6 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 43 % | 23 % | 6 % | 16 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Sympathy | 48 % | 32 % | 10 % | 26 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 49 % | 35 % | 14 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 44 % | 25 % | 13 % | 14 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 43 % | 24 % | 11 % | 21 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Tension | 53 % | 41 % | 24 % | 34 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Tension | 61 % | 53 % | 41 % | 36 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 65 % | 57 % | 51 % | 26 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Tension | 69 % | 60 % | 50 % | 31 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Sympathy | 68 % | 48 % | 30 % | 51 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Sympathy | 64 % | 40 % | 18 % | 54 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 64 % | 50 % | 35 % | 38 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Disturbing | 70 % | 61 % | 60 % | 25 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Disturbing | 75 % | 66 % | 64 % | 28 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 76 % | 71 % | 57 % | 35 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Tension | 76 % | 70 % | 60 % | 39 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Disturbing | 66 % | 49 % | 55 % | 31 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Disturbing | 55 % | 27 % | 47 % | 17 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about The Details. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Plans Inspector
Fantasy Fruit Girl
Alma
Pregnant Traci
Great Internet Boobs
Angela
Ultrasound Child
Basketball player (uncredited)
Detective (uncredited)
Basketball Player (uncredited)
Basketball Player (uncredited)
Mojito Girl (uncredited)
Ron (uncredited)
Basketball Player (uncredited)
Details
- Directed by
- Jacob Estes, Jacob Aaron Estes
- Written by
- Jacob Estes, Jacob Aaron Estes
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2011
- Runtime
- 101 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
