The Calling
2014 · 108 min · Director: Jason Stone
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Hazel Micallef is the senior officer in the Fort Dundas, Ontario Police Department. Once having tried to commit suicide and a resulting chronic back injury are the reasons she will never be promoted, the position of Commanding Officer, of which she is acting, having been vacant for some time. Hazel self-medicates to dull the emotional and physical pain. Relatively young and inexperienced but enthusiastic Ben Wingate transferring from the Toronto Police Department to join her and the only other detective, Ray Green, coincides with the first homicide in Fort Dundas in four years, the victim aged Delia Chandler, a friend of Hazel's mother, retired judge Emily Micallef with who single Hazel lives. Delia's throat was slit, but the coroner is able to determine that the murderer posed Delia's mouth post-mortem, with the time for rigor mortis to set in meaning that he/she had to hold the mouth in place for upwards of an hour. With two subsequent murders in nearby communities with similar oral contortions leads to Hazel believing they are dealing with a serial killer who did not want to be caught, the reason for committing the murders in different jurisdictions. Ben is able to discover that there have been similar murders across the country. With some emerging evidence, Hazel consults Catholic priest Father Price, further leading to the thought that the killer is working on a ritualistic religious mission with more victims to come. With Hazel's own history and situation, it becomes a personal matter between her and the killer, arguably more for the killer than for Hazel herself.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
The Calling (2014) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 30%, Anxiety 25%, Confusion 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Anxiety, Confusion. Genres: Drama, Mystery, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Anxiety and Confusion. Its IMDb rating of 5.9/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 61/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Tension
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Tension | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 36 % | 28 % | 29 % | 18 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Sadness | 52 % | 41 % | 40 % | 39 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 49 % | 38 % | 40 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 45 % | 30 % | 24 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 49 % | 37 % | 34 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Disturbing | 66 % | 59 % | 49 % | 55 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Curiosity | 65 % | 63 % | 48 % | 48 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Curiosity | 62 % | 66 % | 39 % | 35 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Curiosity | 66 % | 73 % | 37 % | 38 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Curiosity | 67 % | 73 % | 44 % | 43 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Curiosity | 66 % | 68 % | 53 % | 51 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Curiosity | 70 % | 66 % | 61 % | 63 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Curiosity | 77 % | 64 % | 70 % | 69 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 82 % | 57 % | 78 % | 69 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 79 % | 56 % | 73 % | 65 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Sadness | 76 % | 53 % | 66 % | 60 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Tension | 81 % | 41 % | 76 % | 63 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Tension | 83 % | 33 % | 73 % | 56 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Relief | 63 % | 24 % | 38 % | 25 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Sadness | 42 % | 13 % | 10 % | 3 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about The Calling. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about The Calling — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Melanie Cartright
Dale Varney
Police Officer
Jolene
Spere
Mason's Secretary
Details
- Directed by
- Jason Stone
- Written by
- Scott Abramovitch, Michael Redhill
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2014
- Runtime
- 108 min
- Country
- United States, Canada, United Kingdom
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





