The Life List
2025 · 123 min · Director: Adam Brooks
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A woman revisits her childhood aspirations, endeavoring to achieve her old goals, only to discover that pursuing these lifelong dreams takes her on an unforeseen and surprising journey.
Emotional fingerprint
The Life List (2025) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Inspiration 30%, Joy 25%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Inspiration30%
- Joy25%
- Love20%
- Hope15%
- Nostalgia10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Inspiration, Joy, Love. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Inspiration, Joy and Love. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Love
- Hope
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Love | Hope | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 45 % | 17 % | 13 % | 30 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Sadness | 54 % | 21 % | 11 % | 45 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Sadness | 58 % | 25 % | 14 % | 46 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Humor | 50 % | 20 % | 19 % | 29 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 48 % | 14 % | 23 % | 21 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 51 % | 14 % | 28 % | 24 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Tension | 55 % | 16 % | 24 % | 33 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Sadness | 61 % | 24 % | 19 % | 48 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Sadness | 61 % | 35 % | 24 % | 44 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Love | 54 % | 39 % | 28 % | 28 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Sadness | 50 % | 34 % | 31 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Hope | 51 % | 26 % | 36 % | 19 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Humor | 53 % | 24 % | 36 % | 18 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Hope | 54 % | 34 % | 34 % | 25 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Love | 60 % | 49 % | 29 % | 34 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Love | 64 % | 51 % | 28 % | 43 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Hope | 63 % | 49 % | 40 % | 41 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 108′ | Hope | 66 % | 56 % | 54 % | 35 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 114′ | Love | 64 % | 59 % | 49 % | 24 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 120′ | Love | 53 % | 52 % | 35 % | 12 % |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Lucas
Julian
Finn
Megan
Ezra
Nina
Donnetta Lavinia Grays
Jackson
Old Man Sullivan
Ellie
Aaron
Corinne
Details
- Directed by
- Adam Brooks
- Written by
- Adam Brooks, Lori Nelson Spielman
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2025
- Runtime
- 123 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Inspiration
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
