What's in a Name?
2012 · 110 min · Director: Alexandre de La Patellière, Matthieu Delaporte
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A father-to-be and his very pregnant wife are invited for dinner by his sister and his brother-in-law. The setting is an upper-middle-class apartment in Paris. When the expecting parents reveal they intend to name their son "Adolphe", everyone else at the dinner is speechless. The situation eventually gets out of hand, when no one can come to an understanding, and everyone starts unearthing old rivalries and unspoken issues.
Emotional fingerprint
What's in a Name? (2012) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Confusion 25%, Anger 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Confusion, Anger. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Confusion and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 7.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Humor
- Surprise
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Surprise
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Humor | Surprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 27 % | 11 % | 25 % | 5 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 28 % | 9 % | 26 % | 5 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Humor | 30 % | 7 % | 28 % | 5 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Surprise | 54 % | 41 % | 47 % | 37 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Tension | 55 % | 47 % | 45 % | 23 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 54 % | 49 % | 44 % | 16 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Humor | 49 % | 43 % | 40 % | 18 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Humor | 45 % | 40 % | 33 % | 19 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Tension | 50 % | 45 % | 33 % | 20 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Humor | 56 % | 52 % | 36 % | 21 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Tension | 60 % | 56 % | 32 % | 24 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Tension | 65 % | 59 % | 32 % | 38 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Surprise | 69 % | 62 % | 34 % | 53 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Tension | 70 % | 62 % | 27 % | 48 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Love | 66 % | 57 % | 21 % | 30 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Tension | 64 % | 57 % | 21 % | 20 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Tension | 62 % | 54 % | 24 % | 19 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Humor | 59 % | 33 % | 29 % | 22 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 107′ | Love | 61 % | 12 % | 34 % | 24 % |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Infirmière bracelet
Apollin
Myrtille
L'obstétricien
Details
- Directed by
- Alexandre de La Patellière, Matthieu Delaporte
- Written by
- Alexandre de La Patellière, Matthieu Delaporte
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2012
- Runtime
- 110 min
- Country
- France, Belgium
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
