Cooties
2014 · 88 min · Director: Jonathan Milott, Cary Murnion
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A mysterious virus hits an isolated elementary school, transforming the kids into a feral swarm of mass savages. An unlikely hero must lead a motley band of teachers in the fight of their lives.
Emotional fingerprint
Cooties (2014) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Fear 20%, Disgust 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Fear20%
- Disgust20%
- Excitement15%
- Smile15%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Fear, Disgust. Genres: Comedy, Action, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Fear and Disgust. Its IMDb rating of 5.7/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 57/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Fear
- Humor
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Disgust
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Fear | Humor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | 20 % | 9 % | 2 % | 12 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 29 % | 10 % | 1 % | 26 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 37 % | 14 % | 2 % | 35 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 47 % | 28 % | 13 % | 37 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Disgust | 63 % | 51 % | 38 % | 40 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Disgust | 75 % | 68 % | 58 % | 42 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Tension | 76 % | 71 % | 57 % | 43 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 68 % | 63 % | 45 % | 44 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Tension | 69 % | 64 % | 48 % | 38 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Tension | 72 % | 67 % | 54 % | 26 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Tension | 67 % | 61 % | 47 % | 26 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Tension | 64 % | 59 % | 42 % | 36 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Humor | 68 % | 64 % | 46 % | 39 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Tension | 69 % | 60 % | 45 % | 34 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Humor | 59 % | 42 % | 27 % | 36 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Humor | 64 % | 49 % | 33 % | 39 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 82 % | 75 % | 60 % | 32 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Tension | 86 % | 82 % | 67 % | 33 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Tension | 78 % | 70 % | 51 % | 40 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Relief | 66 % | 54 % | 34 % | 42 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Jonathan Milott, Cary Murnion
- Written by
- Leigh Whannell, Ian Brennan, Josh C. Waller, Leigh Whannell, Josh C. Waller
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2014
- Runtime
- 88 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
