Stretch
2014 · 94 min · Director: Joe Carnahan
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A hard-luck limo driver struggles to go straight and pay off a debt to his bookie. He takes on a job with a crazed passenger, whose sought-after ledger implicates some seriously dangerous criminals.
Emotional fingerprint
Stretch (2014) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Excitement 25%, Surprise 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Excitement25%
- Surprise20%
- Anxiety10%
- Smile10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Surprise. Genres: Comedy, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 6.5/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Tension
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Tension | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 27 % | 27 % | 40 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 44 % | 29 % | 26 % | 35 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Disturbing | 46 % | 32 % | 31 % | 33 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 48 % | 36 % | 37 % | 31 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Tension | 49 % | 38 % | 40 % | 35 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 38 % | 36 % | 43 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 38 % | 35 % | 45 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 39 % | 36 % | 48 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 38 % | 40 % | 49 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Tension | 59 % | 34 % | 51 % | 45 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Tension | 59 % | 35 % | 55 % | 38 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Tension | 60 % | 39 % | 55 % | 30 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Tension | 66 % | 43 % | 61 % | 29 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Tension | 71 % | 46 % | 68 % | 31 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 68 % | 45 % | 65 % | 36 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 65 % | 38 % | 63 % | 40 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 70 % | 29 % | 66 % | 35 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Relief | 66 % | 23 % | 48 % | 24 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Relief | 64 % | 34 % | 15 % | 14 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Humor | 72 % | 58 % | 3 % | 10 % |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Ignacio's Exotic Dancer
Restaurant Patron
Cameo #3
Details
- Directed by
- Joe Carnahan
- Written by
- Joe Carnahan, Jerry Corley, Rob Rose
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2014
- Runtime
- 94 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
