Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)
2014 · 120 min · Director: Alejandro G. Iñárritu
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Actor Riggan Thomson is most famous for his movie role from over twenty years ago of the comic book superhero Birdman in the blockbuster movie of the same name and its two equally popular sequels. His association with the role took over his life, where Birdman is more renowned than "Riggan Thomson" the actor. Now past middle age, Riggan is trying to establish himself as a true artist by writing, directing, starring in and co-producing with his best friend Jake what is his Broadway debut, an adaptation of Raymond Carver's story, What We Talk About When We Talk About Love. He is staking his name, what little artistic reputation that comes with that name and his life savings on the project, and as such will do anything needed to make the play a success. As he and Jake go through the process of the previews toward opening night, Riggan runs into several issues: needing to find a replacement for the integral supporting male role the night before the first preview; hiring the talented Broadway name, Mike Shiner, for that role, Mike who ends up being difficult to work with and who may end up overshadowing Riggan in the play; having to deal potentially with a lawsuit based on one of his actions to ensure success; needing to be there for his daughter, Sam, who he has hired to be his production assistant and who has just come out of drug rehab; and pleasing the New York Times critic, Tabitha Dickinson, who wants to use any excuse to give the play a scathing review which in turn would close the show after the opening night performance. But Riggan's biggest problem may be his own insecurities, which are manifested by him constantly hearing what he believes to be the truth from the voice of his Birdman character, who he often battles both internally and externally.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (2014) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 27%, Confusion 24%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Confusion, Anxiety. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Confusion and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 7.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Sadness
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Sadness | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 35 % | 8 % | 13 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Humor | 40 % | 30 % | 5 % | 11 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 41 % | 26 % | 6 % | 13 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Humor | 45 % | 36 % | 16 % | 21 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Tension | 50 % | 48 % | 21 % | 27 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Tension | 53 % | 49 % | 23 % | 29 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Tension | 54 % | 45 % | 34 % | 39 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Sadness | 54 % | 38 % | 35 % | 41 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Humor | 53 % | 38 % | 21 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Tension | 56 % | 49 % | 25 % | 31 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Sadness | 56 % | 46 % | 38 % | 43 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Sadness | 53 % | 40 % | 38 % | 43 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Tension | 56 % | 50 % | 35 % | 40 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Tension | 60 % | 54 % | 40 % | 41 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Sadness | 60 % | 50 % | 41 % | 38 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Tension | 61 % | 51 % | 39 % | 36 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Sadness | 66 % | 55 % | 49 % | 50 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Tension | 72 % | 60 % | 57 % | 60 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 111′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 117′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance). From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Korean Grocer
Daniel (Stagehand)
Costume Assistant
Han
Translator
Bartender (Tommy)
Details
- Directed by
- Alejandro G. Iñárritu
- Written by
- Alejandro G. Iñárritu, Nicolás Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris, Armando Bo
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2014
- Runtime
- 120 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.




