The Duke of Burgundy
2014 · 104 min · Director: Peter Strickland
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A woman who studies butterflies and moths tests the limits of her relationship with her lesbian lover.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
The Duke of Burgundy (2014) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 28%, Curiosity 22%, Melancholy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Confusion28%
- Curiosity22%
- Melancholy20%
- Love15%
- Anxiety15%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Curiosity, Melancholy. Genres: Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Curiosity and Melancholy. Its IMDb rating of 6.5/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 66/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Sadness
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Sadness | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Sadness | 35 % | 27 % | 15 % | 3 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Disturbing | 49 % | 40 % | 16 % | 1 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Disturbing | 56 % | 41 % | 14 % | 1 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Curiosity | 47 % | 21 % | 8 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Love | 46 % | 19 % | 6 % | 33 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Tension | 46 % | 29 % | 8 % | 31 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Love | 41 % | 23 % | 10 % | 26 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Curiosity | 36 % | 13 % | 13 % | 19 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 11 % | 14 % | 15 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 18 % | 19 % | 20 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Love | 45 % | 31 % | 20 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Tension | 52 % | 44 % | 21 % | 21 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Sadness | 56 % | 49 % | 33 % | 15 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 58 % | 51 % | 40 % | 15 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Tension | 58 % | 51 % | 38 % | 16 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Tension | 56 % | 50 % | 28 % | 10 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Tension | 48 % | 40 % | 15 % | 6 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Love | 46 % | 29 % | 25 % | 24 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Sadness | 54 % | 29 % | 43 % | 43 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Love | 49 % | 25 % | 37 % | 38 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Evelyn
Dr. Schuller
Dr. Viridana
The Carpenter
Dr. Lurida
Dr. in audience
Details
- Directed by
- Peter Strickland
- Written by
- Peter Strickland
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2014
- Runtime
- 104 min
- Country
- United Kingdom, Hungary
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Confusion
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.




