Window Wonderland
2013 · 90 min · Director: Michael M. Scott
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
It's no holds barred when two Manhattan department store employees vie for the same job during the busy Christmas season. Sloan Van Doren is a driven young woman determined to become the next window dresser at McGuire's department store and to uphold a 95-year-old artistic holiday tradition. Serious and professional, she's the polar opposite of the happy-go-lucky Jake Dooley, who also wants the job. When Mr. Fitch, the head of advertising and promotion, gives them a challenge, the competition is on: each will create a series of seasonal storefront windows twice a week until Christmas. The creator of whichever window display gets the most attention from passersby will get the job. As they go through their paces, with Jake's obvious talent grabbing the public's attention, a silent but mutual attraction develops between the pair, hampered by the contest and the presence of Kenneth, Sloan's blueblood boyfriend, who can't understand the importance Sloan is placing on this job. Supporting the efforts of the window dressers are McGuire's veteran window washer Mac (Terence Kelly) and brassy bathroom attendant Rita who have eyes for each other but haven't done anything about it yet. Love is in the air at McGuire's, but things aren't exactly what they seem. Who will win in this love triangle?
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Window Wonderland (2013) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Love 25%, Happiness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Love25%
- Happiness20%
- Tension15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Happiness. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Happiness. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Love
- Joy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Love | Joy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 40 % | 40 % | 12 % | 18 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 44 % | 44 % | 9 % | 16 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 44 % | 43 % | 9 % | 18 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 43 % | 39 % | 13 % | 20 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 43 % | 38 % | 15 % | 16 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 44 % | 39 % | 18 % | 16 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 45 % | 41 % | 23 % | 23 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 46 % | 43 % | 29 % | 26 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Love | 48 % | 41 % | 31 % | 25 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 48 % | 41 % | 26 % | 18 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Humor | 50 % | 41 % | 31 % | 18 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Love | 56 % | 41 % | 48 % | 29 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Love | 60 % | 39 % | 46 % | 29 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Tension | 55 % | 31 % | 27 % | 16 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Sadness | 51 % | 36 % | 25 % | 19 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Humor | 56 % | 46 % | 33 % | 28 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Tension | 59 % | 43 % | 33 % | 28 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Love | 61 % | 40 % | 40 % | 40 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Joy | 68 % | 40 % | 51 % | 56 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Love | 68 % | 33 % | 57 % | 58 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Window Wonderland. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Window Wonderland — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Michael M. Scott
- Written by
- Neal H. Dobrofsky, Tippi Dobrofsky
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2013
- Runtime
- 90 min
- Country
- United States, Canada
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





