The Abominable Bride
2016 · 90 min · Director: Douglas Mackinnon
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson find themselves in 1890s London in this Christmas special.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
The Abominable Bride (2016) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Curiosity 30%, Confusion 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Curiosity30%
- Confusion25%
- Tension20%
- Surprise15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Curiosity, Confusion, Tension. Genres: Drama, Mystery, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Curiosity, Confusion and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 8.0/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Tension
- Confusion
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Confusion
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Tension | Confusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 43 % | 32 % | 17 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 55 % | 44 % | 32 % | 15 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Tension | 63 % | 51 % | 49 % | 21 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Curiosity | 64 % | 60 % | 52 % | 27 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Curiosity | 55 % | 54 % | 33 % | 24 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 51 % | 40 % | 19 % | 19 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 59 % | 43 % | 32 % | 20 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Tension | 69 % | 55 % | 59 % | 24 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Tension | 68 % | 56 % | 64 % | 21 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 66 % | 53 % | 60 % | 21 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Tension | 73 % | 57 % | 65 % | 33 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Curiosity | 71 % | 63 % | 64 % | 39 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 70 % | 61 % | 61 % | 43 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Confusion | 71 % | 60 % | 61 % | 53 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Curiosity | 70 % | 64 % | 59 % | 49 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Curiosity | 71 % | 69 % | 53 % | 38 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Curiosity | 73 % | 68 % | 50 % | 44 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Confusion | 75 % | 59 % | 61 % | 50 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 71 % | 46 % | 59 % | 36 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 40 % | 38 % | 23 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Janine Donlevy
Stamford
Thomas Ricoletti
Jane
Details
- Directed by
- Douglas Mackinnon
- Written by
- Arthur Conan Doyle, Mark Gatiss, Steven Moffat, Mark Gatiss
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2016
- Runtime
- 90 min
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Curiosity
- Data updated
Where to watch
Data: JustWatch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.




