Men & Chicken
2015 · 104 min · Director: Anders Thomas Jensen
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Through getting to know their unknown family, two outcast brothers discover a horrible truth about themselves and their relatives.
Emotional fingerprint
Men & Chicken (2015) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 30%, Humor 25%, Disgust 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Humor, Disgust. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Mystery. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Humor and Disgust. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Sympathy
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Sympathy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Sympathy | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 48 % | 45 % | 37 % | 10 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 46 % | 35 % | 10 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 53 % | 44 % | 25 % | 14 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 43 % | 24 % | 19 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 51 % | 39 % | 25 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 54 % | 34 % | 20 % | 20 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 55 % | 29 % | 18 % | 28 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Disturbing | 57 % | 34 % | 19 % | 36 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 50 % | 23 % | 40 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Disturbing | 63 % | 54 % | 26 % | 43 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Humor | 59 % | 54 % | 24 % | 38 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 63 % | 19 % | 39 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Curiosity | 70 % | 55 % | 29 % | 44 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Sympathy | 66 % | 29 % | 45 % | 35 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Humor | 55 % | 16 % | 48 % | 24 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Sympathy | 57 % | 29 % | 46 % | 28 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Tension | 74 % | 52 % | 51 % | 50 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Disturbing | 83 % | 54 % | 61 % | 61 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Sympathy | 80 % | 33 % | 68 % | 48 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Ingrid Abbott
Susan
Færgefører
Mia
Tove
Far
Døds Bo
Details
- Directed by
- Anders Thomas Jensen
- Written by
- Anders Thomas Jensen
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2015
- Runtime
- 104 min
- Country
- Denmark, Germany
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Confusion
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
