feeldb

Orphan

2016 · 111 min · Director: Arnaud des Pallières ★ IMDb 6 · 1,651 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Four different instances in the life of the same woman, as this is divided into four significant periods of her existence: childhood, puberty, adolescence, and adulthood, all representing fragments and diverse aspects of her being as its central focal point. Emotionally damaged, Renée is a caring schoolteacher committed to the education of underprivileged youth, trying to get pregnant with her boyfriend in an attempt to straighten out her life. However, her past catches up to her in the shape of Tara, a self-destructive, addicted gambler who has some unfinished business with her which dates back some seven years. Stepping back in time we find careless, fresh 20-something Sandra, whom elderly professional gambler Lev introduces to the world of horse racing and gives her a job at the racetrack as a "mule"--carrying bet money to the cashiers. Further back in time, Karine is an early-developed, audacious 13-year-old who engages in a constant merry-go-round of superficial relationships, always on the run from her brutal father, craving the attention she has never received. Ultimately, we see Kiki, a little girl from the province, whose innocent game of hide-and-seek quickly turns into a disaster. In the end, as we examine this fractured portrait of interconnected parallel lives, we can finally reach the very soul of a fearless woman, a complex individual who is determined to achieve freedom.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Orphan

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Orphan (2016) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 30%, Anxiety 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Anxiety, Sadness. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Crime. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Anxiety and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 6.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 63/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Sympathy
  • Tension
  • Sadness

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Sympathy

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Relief

Sympathy
Tension
Sadness
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then rises around 43 %, then peaks around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensitySympathyTensionSadness
2.5 %≈ 3′Sympathy43 %33 %33 %15 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Tension56 %34 %52 %18 %
12.5 %≈ 14′Tension60 %38 %55 %24 %
17.5 %≈ 19′Sympathy51 %39 %41 %26 %
22.5 %≈ 25′Tension48 %34 %36 %20 %
27.5 %≈ 31′Sympathy48 %26 %35 %11 %
32.5 %≈ 36′Tension51 %29 %39 %18 %
37.5 %≈ 42′Sadness53 %39 %39 %30 %
42.5 %≈ 47′Sympathy58 %46 %48 %28 %
47.5 %≈ 53′Tension71 %56 %66 %28 %
52.5 %≈ 58′Sympathy75 %64 %65 %39 %
57.5 %≈ 64′Sympathy73 %66 %54 %48 %
62.5 %≈ 69′Sympathy69 %63 %51 %48 %
67.5 %≈ 75′Sympathy66 %55 %59 %43 %
72.5 %≈ 80′Tension74 %60 %63 %50 %
77.5 %≈ 86′Sadness78 %65 %57 %59 %
82.5 %≈ 92′Tension73 %58 %63 %39 %
87.5 %≈ 97′Tension75 %59 %73 %19 %
92.5 %≈ 103′Relief82 %67 %75 %20 %
97.5 %≈ 108′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Cinderella

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Orphan. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Orphan — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

SR
Solène Rigot

SR
Solène Rigot

Karine

JL
Jalil Lespert

Darius

Sergi López

Maurice

VC
Vega Cuzytek

Kiki

Nicolas Duvauchelle

Kiki's Father

Karim Leklou

Friend of Kiki's Father

JB
Jonas Bloquet

Patrick

RR
Rayan Rabia

Hakim

MM
Mehdi Meskar

Samy

ED
Edéa Darcque

Naya

LD
Laurent Delbecque

RK
Rami Kabteni

TR
Timothée Régnier

NM
Nina Melo

Cindy

Details

Directed by
Arnaud des Pallières
Written by
Arnaud des Pallières, Christelle Berthevas
Type
Movies
Released
2016
Runtime
111 min
Country
France
Ratings
★ IMDb 6 · 1,651 ratings
Feels mostly
Confusion
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.