feeldb

Memoir of a Murderer

2017 · 128 min · Director: Won Shin-yeon, Won Shin-yun ★ IMDb 7.2 · 15,835 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Former serial killer Byung-su gets diagnosed with Alzheimer's. The doctor tells him that it's due to the aftereffects from a traffic accident 17 years ago; the same accident that stopped him from his killings and allowed him to live a normal life with his dear daughter. So when a series of murders occurs near his town, Byung-su gets worried whether the killings are his doing during his memory lapses. But then he comes across Tae-ju and instinctively realizes that he is the serial killer. He reports this to the police, only to learn that Tae-ju is one. Byung-su tries to find firm evidence that Tae-ju is a psychopath, but only raises Tae-ju's interest in him and his daughter. And now with his memory slipping, Byung-su must find a way to protect his daughter from Tae-ju.

Trailer for Memoir of a Murderer

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Memoir of a Murderer (2017) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 30%, Confusion 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Confusion, Tension. Genres: Mystery, Crime, Action. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Confusion and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 7.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Disturbing
  • Anxiety

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Anxiety

Dominant emotion: Confusion

Tension
Disturbing
Anxiety
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then dips around 28 %, then peaks around 78 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionDisturbingAnxiety
2.5 %≈ 3′Sadness57 %38 %37 %37 %
7.5 %≈ 10′Disturbing65 %44 %56 %35 %
12.5 %≈ 16′Disturbing68 %48 %60 %38 %
17.5 %≈ 22′Tension65 %55 %48 %46 %
22.5 %≈ 29′Tension59 %50 %40 %41 %
27.5 %≈ 35′Sadness56 %43 %35 %36 %
32.5 %≈ 42′Tension64 %57 %35 %51 %
37.5 %≈ 48′Tension74 %73 %43 %64 %
42.5 %≈ 54′Tension77 %74 %54 %65 %
47.5 %≈ 61′Anxiety81 %75 %66 %69 %
52.5 %≈ 67′Tension84 %80 %74 %74 %
57.5 %≈ 74′Tension85 %80 %75 %73 %
62.5 %≈ 80′Sadness84 %77 %74 %69 %
67.5 %≈ 86′Tension84 %79 %73 %69 %
72.5 %≈ 93′Disturbing86 %82 %78 %72 %
77.5 %≈ 99′Tension89 %85 %81 %76 %
82.5 %≈ 106′Sadness87 %81 %71 %73 %
87.5 %≈ 112′Confusion82 %72 %58 %65 %
92.5 %≈ 118′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
97.5 %≈ 125′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Oh Dal-su

Byung-man

HS
Hwang Seok-jeong

Yeon-ju

LB
Lee Byung-joon

Poetry Instructor

Kim Min-jae

Young Prosecutor

Jo Jae-yun

Doctor

CY
Choi Yoo-song

Byung-su's Mother

KH
Kim Han-joon

Detective

KH
Kim Hye-yoon

Young Maria

JJ
Jung Ji-woo

Girlfriend

LM
Lee Myung-ha

Police Officer

LS
Lee Sae-ro-mi

Cat

CK
Chae Kook-hee

Mi-ok

Don Lee

Actor on Screen

WP
Won Pung-yeon

Detective

KJ
Kim Ji-na

News Reporter

JC
Jeong Chan-bae

Details

Written by
Kim Young-ha, Jo-yun Hwang, Hwang Jo-yoon, Won Shin-yun
Type
Movies
Released
2017
Runtime
128 min
Country
South Korea
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.2 · 15,835 ratings
Feels mostly
Anxiety
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.