Clara
2018 · 106 min · Director: Akash Sherman
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Dr. Isaac Bruno, an astronomer and astrophysics professor at Ontario University in Toronto, has been obsessed with needing to discover that there is life in the cosmos besides on Earth. This obsession has been a negative Catch-22 in his life: he has needed this focus to fill a void in his personal life following a tragedy that partly led to the dissolution of his marriage to fellow astronomer Dr. Rebecca Jenkins, while the frustration he has felt in such a discovery not yet having been made has resulted in him acting inappropriately in all aspects of his life. That professional behavior has in turn led to he being indefinitely suspended from the university, which also means no access to university resources or equipment hindering that search. It is bad timing as advances in telescope technology, such as TESS, not only provides much data to the community, but any evidence as to the possibility of life would provide access to that technology. Desperate for help without many resources, he advertises for an unpaid assistant, beyond the provision of room and board. The only application he receives is from Clara, an artist not only with no astrophysics background but little education let alone at a post-secondary level, she who he suspects is more interested in the room and board in being seemingly homeless. Beyond her dog Eeva, her prized possessions are a collection of rocks she carries with her everywhere, obtained most from her world travels, one from and indicative of each continent. Isaac ends up hiring her on her plea of hard work and learning fast. Regardless of what Isaac may or may not find with Clara's help, she, who has a keen sense of observation being an artist, may provide him with something more valuable for his life in a holistic sense.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Clara (2018) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 28%, Curiosity 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Curiosity, Anxiety. Genres: Drama, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Curiosity and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Awe
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Awe
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Awe | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 25 % | 13 % | 35 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Sadness | 46 % | 26 % | 13 % | 31 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 20 % | 19 % | 39 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 13 % | 24 % | 46 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 11 % | 25 % | 48 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 18 % | 18 % | 41 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Tension | 49 % | 34 % | 6 % | 29 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Sadness | 60 % | 49 % | 14 % | 29 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Awe | 59 % | 40 % | 30 % | 41 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Curiosity | 59 % | 40 % | 28 % | 38 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Sadness | 70 % | 56 % | 20 % | 29 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Love | 65 % | 45 % | 21 % | 36 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 32 % | 24 % | 39 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Love | 68 % | 49 % | 19 % | 28 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Sadness | 85 % | 76 % | 6 % | 16 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Sadness | 88 % | 76 % | 9 % | 28 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Curiosity | 80 % | 48 % | 39 % | 56 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Awe | 83 % | 39 % | 73 % | 70 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Awe | 88 % | 48 % | 85 % | 70 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Clara. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Clara — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
CalTech Assistant
Bar Patron
Lead Technician
Owner
Lab Student
Details
- Directed by
- Akash Sherman
- Written by
- Akash Sherman, James Ewasiuk
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2018
- Runtime
- 106 min
- Country
- Canada, United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





