Good on Paper
2021 · 92 min · Director: Kimmy Gatewood
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
After years of putting her career first, a stand-up comic meets a guy who seems perfect: smart, nice, successful and possibly too good to be true.
Emotional fingerprint
Good on Paper (2021) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Confusion 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Confusion25%
- Anxiety20%
- Satisfaction15%
- Surprise10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Confusion, Anxiety. Genres: Comedy, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Confusion and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 5.6/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 58/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Curiosity
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Curiosity | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 52 % | 52 % | 15 % | 8 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 49 % | 49 % | 16 % | 11 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 46 % | 45 % | 19 % | 11 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 44 % | 40 % | 21 % | 15 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Humor | 48 % | 36 % | 24 % | 25 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Sadness | 51 % | 35 % | 26 % | 26 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Humor | 50 % | 35 % | 36 % | 28 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 31 % | 51 % | 40 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 29 % | 55 % | 46 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Curiosity | 55 % | 31 % | 53 % | 45 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 36 % | 54 % | 45 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 44 % | 58 % | 46 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Curiosity | 65 % | 48 % | 60 % | 51 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 65 % | 49 % | 54 % | 53 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Humor | 64 % | 50 % | 44 % | 52 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Tension | 66 % | 45 % | 40 % | 59 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Tension | 65 % | 30 % | 36 % | 54 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Sadness | 61 % | 20 % | 30 % | 43 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Sadness | 57 % | 28 % | 29 % | 38 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Relief | 55 % | 37 % | 30 % | 32 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Chanterelle
Maggie
Alli
Casting Director
Writer
Producer
Rhonda Steward
Grace
Details
- Directed by
- Kimmy Gatewood
- Written by
- Iliza Shlesinger, Iliza Shlesinger
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2021
- Runtime
- 92 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
