The Fog
2005 · 100 min · Director: Rupert Wainwright
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Trapped within an eerie mist, the residents of Antonio Bay have become the unwitting victims of a horrifying vengeance. One hundred years earlier, a ship carrying lepers was purposely lured onto the rocky coastline and sank, drowning all aboard. Now they're back – long-dead mariners who've waited a century for their revenge.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
The Fog (2005) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 35%, Tension 30%, Curiosity 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Fear35%
- Tension30%
- Curiosity20%
- Disturbing15%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Tension, Curiosity. Genres: Mystery, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Tension and Curiosity. Its IMDb rating of 3.7/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Fear
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Fear | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 45 % | 42 % | 32 % | 30 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 34 % | 26 % | 16 % | 24 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Curiosity | 31 % | 20 % | 9 % | 25 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 31 % | 16 % | 35 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Tension | 50 % | 45 % | 29 % | 40 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Tension | 48 % | 43 % | 32 % | 39 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 29 % | 24 % | 40 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 33 % | 24 % | 45 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Tension | 56 % | 50 % | 38 % | 44 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 54 % | 51 % | 39 % | 43 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 46 % | 31 % | 53 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Curiosity | 55 % | 49 % | 30 % | 59 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Curiosity | 59 % | 55 % | 38 % | 51 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 68 % | 66 % | 55 % | 38 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 74 % | 74 % | 66 % | 25 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 77 % | 76 % | 68 % | 25 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 81 % | 79 % | 69 % | 35 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Tension | 83 % | 82 % | 72 % | 40 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 30 % | 20 % | 45 % |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Andy Wayne
Founding Father David Williams
Founding Father Patrick Malone
Founding Father Norman Castle
Founding Father Richard Wayne
Mr. Latham
Details
- Directed by
- Rupert Wainwright
- Written by
- Cooper Layne
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2005
- Runtime
- 100 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Fear
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





