Godsend
2004 · 102 min · Director: Nick Hamm
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A couple agree to have their deceased son cloned under the supervision of an enigmatic doctor, but bizarre things start to happen years after his rebirth.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Godsend (2004) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 35%, Anxiety 25%, Disturbing 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Fear35%
- Anxiety25%
- Disturbing20%
- Sadness10%
- Confusion10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Anxiety, Disturbing. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Anxiety and Disturbing. Its IMDb rating of 4.8/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 33 % | 18 % | 17 % | 5 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Sadness | 49 % | 28 % | 26 % | 10 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Sadness | 75 % | 34 % | 37 % | 10 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Sadness | 76 % | 31 % | 38 % | 9 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Tension | 63 % | 34 % | 30 % | 10 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Relief | 66 % | 46 % | 27 % | 24 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Tension | 70 % | 57 % | 35 % | 40 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Relief | 62 % | 55 % | 43 % | 36 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Curiosity | 62 % | 57 % | 46 % | 37 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 68 % | 63 % | 48 % | 45 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Curiosity | 67 % | 58 % | 56 % | 38 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Curiosity | 64 % | 56 % | 57 % | 35 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Tension | 67 % | 63 % | 50 % | 44 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Tension | 76 % | 71 % | 50 % | 55 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Sadness | 79 % | 73 % | 57 % | 56 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Curiosity | 81 % | 74 % | 65 % | 61 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Tension | 86 % | 82 % | 66 % | 71 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Tension | 83 % | 79 % | 56 % | 65 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Tension | 70 % | 65 % | 41 % | 49 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Tension | 55 % | 53 % | 32 % | 34 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
St. Pius Student
Mrs. Baker
Young Thug #2
Clara Sandler
Sandra Shaw
Hal Shaw
Tanya
Details
- Directed by
- Nick Hamm
- Written by
- Mark Bomback
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2004
- Runtime
- 102 min
- Country
- Canada, United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Fear
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





